After the Battle of Chancellorsville, General Lee finally did begin to make offensive plans from his position of defense. Looking back, one can see that these offensive plans were long foreseen by military theorists Henri Jomini and Carl Von Clausewitz, although they, of course were not spectators of the US Civil War.In both their writings, these theorists declared that a defense, even after a tactical victory, could not remain passive. Both theorists believed that after a successful defensive victory was achieved, offensive maneuvers were needed lest the beaten enemy revise its plans to attack once more.
This is a summary of their ideas. Lee and President Davis did not, however, consult with past warfare ideas. The idea to strike a telling blow against the North was at that time logical but risky. The Battle of Gettysburg was not faraway in June of 1863.
A corollary is used in reasoning out theories. In most theories one would have to work out the whole situation from start to end literally but with a corollary it is only necessary to imagine that it exists in order to proceed.
A regular soldier and professor at the Virginia Military Institute who became one of the most famous Confederate Generals. Robert E. Lee's spectacular series of victories in the summer of 1862 were really due to the exceptional teamwork between Lee and Jackson, and when he was killed at the Battle of Chancellorsville, Lee declared that he had 'lost his right arm'. He was undoubtedly a military genius, and his bold thrusting style was fully in the Confederate tradition. He was, however, highly eccentric - not always attractively so - and his fatal shooting has been the subject of many conflicting theories, including assassination by his own men. A strange note, found pinned to his body, adds weight to this theory.
in the first battle of bull run he broke his finger. but after the battle of chancellorsville he was shot with friendly fire and had to have his arm amputated. He died 10 days later of nemonia due to the amputation.
Ancient Greeks had two major theories of matter. These were the Atomic theory of matter and the theory of pangenesis.
Do Lamarck's theories provide a good explanation for the change in months? Why or why not?
Carl Von Clausewitz was a Prussian military writer in at the end of the 18th century and well into the 19th century. He based many of his writings on military strategies and tactics based on his observations of Frederick the Great and of Napoleon. Many US West Point students became aware of his works and were used in varying degrees in the US Civil War.
In the Spring of 1862, Union armies under the command of George B. McClellan and Henry Wager Halleck made coordinated advances against the South. These are called time and space by military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz. It means that the Union concentrated its forces and made a two pronged attack on the South.
The two giants of nineteenth century military thinking are Carl Von Clausewitz and Henri Johmini. Both theorists wrote about the ideas of Frederick the Great and Napoleon, and added their own ides as well. Many students of their ideas believe that World War One is an example of their ways of thinking about military strategies. But there is much more than that. For example, the United States Army's Field Manual of Operations dated August of 1982, includes many of the ideas published by Clausewitz and Johmini.
nobody knows for sure there are many theories
The contingency approach is different from early management theories because it advices managers to treat every situation as unique. There is no super way of managing every situation.
Military Intervention is practiced in politics when a situation is so horrific (1990's Somali Famine) that the world sent troops to guard and distribute the UN food supplies. Another form of intervention is a 'Pre-emptive Strike", as used by Israel in the 1967 War when they attacked first, as the Jordanian, Syrian, and Egyptian armies were gathering to attack them.
Contingency theories suggest that there is no single best way to manage or lead in all situations. Instead, the effectiveness of a leadership style or management approach depends on the specific circumstances and context in which they are applied. These theories emphasize the need for flexibility and adaptability in leadership and management practices.
science is the systematically study of things using theories and then test.
A corollary is used in reasoning out theories. In most theories one would have to work out the whole situation from start to end literally but with a corollary it is only necessary to imagine that it exists in order to proceed.
The management theory jungle refers to the large number of managerial theories that are available today. So many managerial theories are available that it can be difficult to choose the right one for the situation.
Laws exist in nature and can be discovered. Theories are attempts to explain something (such as the behavior of something in a specific situation) Hypotheses are suggestions which hopefully can be tested and if proved correct could become theory.
Classical theories of management is general and modern theories are more specific. Classical theories attempt to identify general rules of management or organization that should apply to all types of enterprises. Modern theory of management is called contingency theory. It takes the view that management and leadership varies according to circumstances, and what is best in one situation may not be the best in another.