answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did the pro-slavery groups and the antislavery groups feel about the dred Scott decision?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Was dred Scott decision pro or antislavery?

In the 1857 US Supreme Court decision that involved the Dredd Scott case, the Court stated the slaves were property and, also, they could never be US citizens. This pro-slavery decision would later require an amendment to the US Constitution in order to abolish slavery.


Was the dred Scott decision proslavery?

Yep. The Dred Scott decision was all about how Dred Scott went with his slave owner up to a "free state" and stayed long enough to, technically, be free. He turned this into a court case and took it to the Supreme Court. They decided that he could never become a citizen because of his race, and could, therefore, never sue in court. The court justices thought in theory that slavery was protected by the constitution. (which it is absolutely not!) I hope this clears it up :]


How did the northerners and southerners react to the Dred Scott decision?

Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.


Why did the kansas nebraska act and the dred Scott decision anger those who appose slavery?

When the US Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, it angered antislavery groups because they believed it would expand the institution of slavery in new States and Territories. That was because political leaders such as Senator Stephen Douglas and others believed in what was called popular sovereignty. This called for a vote among citizens as to whether slavery would be allowed in a given territory or State. The pro-slavery movement from the South was strong, thus abolitionists were concerned about the spread of this institution. The Dred Scott case was decided by the US Supreme Court. It was a long written decision that basically stated the slaves were property and that slavery was legal under the US Constitution. This was a blow to the antislavery movement.


What group was benefited most by dred Scott decision?

Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.


How was the dred Scott decision good?

The direct answer to the question is that the Dred Scott decision was good for slave owners. In a larger sense it was not good at all. The decision by the US Supreme Court was more important to the United States than it was to slave holder Dred Scott. This was so because in an 1857 Supreme Court decision, slaves in the United States, whether in bondage or freed men & women, could never be US citizens. This decision was a setback for the antislavery abolitionists and a victory of sorts for slave owners. Taken in its totality it was a setback for the United States as a whole. The above answer is correct, however, if there was "good" in the Dredd Scott decision it was that the US Supreme Court made it clear what its position on slavery was. Thereby giving opponents of slavery ground to stand on in their efforts to limit or abolish slavery.


What did Stonewall Jackson think of the Dred Scott Decision?

Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea


What was decision in the dred Scott case was that?

Scott was a slave and could not win suit.


What decision in the dred Scott case was that .?

Scott was a slave and could not win suit.


The decision in the Dred Scott case was that .?

Scott was a slave and could not bring suit


The dred Scott decision stated that slaves?

the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee


Why did the Dred Scott decision alarm Northerners?

The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.