There were indeed stark social differences between the North and the South in the years leading up to the American Civil War. The South was an agrarian society that largely relied on slave labor and a plantation system to drive its economy. ... Unlike the South, the North had a larger urban...
In the North, there was more of a middle class, industrial economy, and urbanization, leading to a more even distribution of wealth. In the South, a large agricultural economy based on slavery resulted in a small wealthy class of plantation owners and a large lower class of enslaved people and poor whites, creating a more pronounced divide between social classes.
In the North, social life often revolved around community gatherings, churches, and town centers. In the South, social life was centered around plantations, where wealthy landowners hosted events and gatherings for the local elite. Both regions valued social status, hospitality, and community ties.
One similarity between the social systems of Europe and South Asia or China during this period was the presence of hierarchical structures based on feudalism or caste systems. In all three regions, society was organized into clear social classes with limited mobility between them. The ruling elite held power and authority over the lower classes, shaping the social order of each region.
Free blacks in the North generally had more access to education, social mobility, and employment opportunities compared to those in the South. They also faced discrimination and racism, though to a lesser extent than in the South. Similarities include facing legal restrictions, such as Black Codes, and social prejudice regardless of their location.
Free blacks in both the north and south faced discrimination, limited job opportunities, social segregation, and restrictions on their civil rights. They were also at risk of being kidnapped and sold into slavery in the south, and faced the constant threat of being captured under the Fugitive Slave Laws in the north.
The North was a highly industrialized society fed by a large number of small family farms. It had a relatively large and mobile middle class, and consisted of a large diversity of ethnic groups, even though most of the nationalities were Caucasian and Protestant, but with a sizable minority of Irish Catholics. The South was primarily agrarian, largely due to a small number of large single-product cash-crop plantations owned by a wealthy minority of Caucasian Protestants, with a concentration of Catholics in and around Louisiana, but whose labor force consisted of a mix of first, second, and third generation African slaves. There was practically no manufacturing base in the South.
How did the social system in the south differ from the social system in new england?
There is nothing special about them. Mainly in North Korea the social classes were " eliminated " supposedly. They really weren't Kim II Sung and other higher class rulers referred to lower class citizens as dirty foreigners. Obviously, they didn't like lower class peoples. As for South Korea I do not have any knowledge what so ever of their social classes.
North/South Carolina. He founded this colony to setup a new colony based upon social classes. this project failed and divided into two parts.
The North's population was much larger than the South's.
The North's population was much larger than the South's.
The North's population was larger
Dennis P. Hogan has written: 'Racial stratification and socioeconomic change in the American North and South' -- subject(s): Social classes, Social conditions
the north didnt want slavery but the south want slavery
The South was very agricultural whereas the North was not. The North's economy was based on manufacturing and the South had plantations where crops were grown.
a
The North's population was much larger than the South's.
South Korea is a modern democracy and North Korea is a communist dictatorship.