0
How did the southern slave holders that the north benefited from slavery?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Were the Southern colonies friendly?
No. The southerns were the ones who started slavery where as the north prohibited it. The southern started slavery especially around the Civil War.
Was there slavery in Zimbabwe?
No, slavery was mostly based in West, North, Central and East Africa. There is no history of slavery in Southern African countries like Zimbabwe.
The Missouri copromise of 1820 did what for the legality of slavery?
It banned slavery in any new states North of Missouri's Southern border.
Was the North for or against slavery?
against slavery and the south was for slavery!! <3
How did the Southern political leaders become convinced that slavery was under attack by the North?
There were many abolitionist activists and politicians who wanted to get rid of slavery.
How did southerners claim that the North benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
How did slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
How did Southerners slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
How did Southern slaveholders attempt to convince people in the North to support slavery?
The Southerners pointed out that northern industry relied on southern cotton. Southern slaveholders argued that slavery benefited both the South and the North because the North's textile and shipping industries depended upon cotton from the South.
What are the cons of the Missouri compromise?
Good question! The North benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another state in the North (Maine) that did not allow slavery (because the North didn't like slavery.) The South benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another southern state (Missouri) that was capable of having slaves. This way, both the North and the South had an equal amount of 12 Northern states and 12 Southern states.
What are pros and cons of arguing?
Good question! The North benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another state in the North (Maine) that did not allow slavery (because the North didn't like slavery.) The South benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another southern state (Missouri) that was capable of having slaves. This way, both the North and the South had an equal amount of 12 Northern states and 12 Southern states.
Why did many Americans oppose abolishing slavery?
Because it benefited the North, They feared that the blacks would take their jobs, and also worried that the end of slavery would cut off the supply of southern cotton for northern textile mills.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of The Missouri Compromise?
An advantage to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that slavery would not be permitted in the territory that is now the state of Missouri. A disadvantage to the Missouri Compromise was that people who believed in slavery in the South could not move north to gain more land and keep their slaves.
Why did southern states voted to secede?
Because they wanted Slavery and the North didn't want slavery
Were the Southern colonies friendly?
No. The southerns were the ones who started slavery where as the north prohibited it. The southern started slavery especially around the Civil War.
Was there slavery in Zimbabwe?
No, slavery was mostly based in West, North, Central and East Africa. There is no history of slavery in Southern African countries like Zimbabwe.
The Missouri copromise of 1820 did what for the legality of slavery?
It banned slavery in any new states North of Missouri's Southern border.
