Want this question answered?
The main difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is that the Christian forces successfully captured Jerusalem and surrounding lands in the First Crusade and experienced heavy losses in the Second Crusade. Both crusades were formed to reconquer Muslim lands that had been previously Christian and/or Jewish.
The first crusade was so successful, because the muslim defenders were so un unified.
The First Crusade was the only successful Crusade.
Because people were taught about religious beliefs that they had to adhere to because there would be serious punishment. so it was kind of an obligation to believe in religion. That's why there was a lot of support in the first crusade because people had to participate. This is what i think, i may be wrong
Well, really there isn't a particular reason, if indeed this is a colloquial reference for the Third Crusade that I'm not aware of then it is probably, as a previous person answered,"Because the kind of England Richard the Lion Heart (Richard the III) lead his army himself during the holy crusades."However, I think you may be getting confused; I would reference the Second Crusade as the Kings' Crusade because this was the first time that royalty had been on crusade - partially due to the king of France - Philip I - having been excommunicated shortly before the events of the First Crusade.Hope that helps!
it lasted longer
crusaders took too much equipment
Well apparently it is called the noble crusade because everyone who went on the first crusade and the noble crusade were noble
No in the second crusade.
The First Crusade was highly successful, while the Second was not.
One significant difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is the outcomes. The First Crusade resulted in the capture of Jerusalem by the Christian forces, while the Second Crusade did not achieve its primary objective of recapturing Edessa. Additionally, the First Crusade was more successful and united in its goals, while the Second Crusade faced more challenges and internal conflicts among the Christian leaders.
The main difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is that the Christian forces successfully captured Jerusalem and surrounding lands in the First Crusade and experienced heavy losses in the Second Crusade. Both crusades were formed to reconquer Muslim lands that had been previously Christian and/or Jewish.
voting rights, as well as full equality
Which one? First crusade - 1095-1099 Second crusade -1145-1148 Third crusade - 1187-1192 Fourth crusade - 1202-1204
The church encouraged the second crusade by preaching the need to defend the Christian kingdoms in the Holy Land from Muslim forces, promoting the idea that participating in the crusade was a way to gain spiritual merit and forgiveness of sins, and issuing papal bulls to rally support for the crusade and garner participation from European rulers and knights.
The first crusade was so successful, because the muslim defenders were so un unified.
crusaders took too much equipment.