I think there is much mythology in the whole idea of testing hypotheses.
"So long as we use a certain language, all questions that we can ask will have to be formulated in it and will thereby confirm the theory of the universe which is implied in the vocabulary and structure of the language."
Michael Polanyi
William Glen observes thatthe success of a hypothesis, or its service to science, lies not simply in its perceived "truth", or power to displace, subsume or reduce a predecessor idea, but perhaps more in its ability to stimulate the research that will illuminate … bald suppositions and areas of vagueness
And finally from my notes on your question comes the point I am trying to make, as Einstein makes it :
"How does it happen that a properly endowed natural scientist comes to concern himself with epistemology? Is there no more valuable work in his specialty? I hear many of my colleagues saying, and I sense it from many more, that they feel this way. I cannot share this sentiment. ... Concepts that have proven useful in ordering things easily achieve such an authority over us that we forget their earthly origins and accept them as unalterable givens. Thus they come to be stamped as 'necessities of thought,' 'a priori givens,' etc.
"The path of scientific advance is often made impassable for a long time through such errors. For that reason, it is by no means an idle game if we become practiced in analyzing the long-commonplace concepts and exhibiting [revealing, exposing? -Ed.] those circumstances upon which their justification and usefulness depend, how they have grown up, individually, out of the givens of experience. By this means, their all-too-great authority will be broken." Einstein, 1916, "Memorial notice for Ernst Mach," Physikalische Zeitschrift 17: 101-02.
Koch, a well know scientist, tested his hypothesis by Examining female organs. 100% sure that I'm right
It is observation because observsation means what you see.
It means that he or she does not find the hypothesis to be plausible.
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
Discard or change the hypothesis
by conducting an expriment
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
Data
test it
Depending on the results of that test, either accept or reject that hypothesis.
scientists test their hypothesis buy making observations or doing research
scientists test their hypothesis buy making observations or doing research
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
The experiment that you will design is done to test the hypothesis.
To understand. To see if they're right.
Preform an expiriment