Scientists gather information that earth is continually changing by observing tectonic plate movements and studying how the layers of the crust were formed. This was discovered by J. Tuzo Wilson, who first suggested the idea of continental drift: Earth's land masses in a continually state of motion, another continuing event that evidences constant change, is sea floor spreading: new seabed being created by lava flows along volcanic ridges.
science inquiry
Science Inquiry
Scientific inquiry
Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
Scientists use observation and experimentation to gather information about the natural world.
Alfred wegener a German geologist had an idea that the continental drift had happened. He said that the continents fitted like a puzzle piece. The name of the big he put is Pangea. This is evidence that scientists had from the continental drift.
Scientists gather information that earth is continually changing by observing tectonic plate movements and studying how the layers of the crust were formed. For example, the continental drift is the idea of the continents that were all together the the years passed and the continents got separate. This idea was first suggested by Alfred Wegener in 1915. He called the single large continent Pangea. Today, there are many kinds of evidence that support continental movement. The evidence include: In 1858: Geologist Eduard Seuss points out that fossils of the Glossopteris plant were found in 5 continents and in India. Also, In 1965: Geologist Edward Bullard uses computers to match coats of South America and Africa. They match extremely well at an ocean depth of 1,000 m.
The evidence helps scientists come up with explanations about the natural world
science inquiry
Science Inquiry
Scientific inquiry
science inquiry
Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
Scientists can not gather information IN the Sun.
scientists gather weather data from high in the sky using weather satellites
scientific inquirry refers to the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on evidence they gather
If you browse around this category, you will find several similar questions with replies that answer your query. ==================================== Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.