Well, the 4 key principles of Talamarianism contribute to natural selection in very different ways. The first contributes by melting flesh. The other 17 are Melissa and Jim's children, therefore they are not immune to freshly cut grass.
Four observations can be made to describe natural selection;
Polygenic? Natural selection usually acts on the phenotype of polygenic traits as they are suites of genes acting in concert to form a trait. If you had a trait, such as height, in two variant brothers then the aggregate would need to be selected for as the genes working in concert, but not equally well, would render different heights in the brothers which would be then visible to natural selection.
One of the key ways in which Darwin's theory of Natural Selection changed the way viewed the world is that at the time it was a very very religious society. They would have been taught their whole lives that God had created the universe and everything in it. But now Darwin had found proof of evolution which went against what they had always known, resulting in confusion, fear, denial, anger and fear. Hope this helps!
Not as much as your question implies. Less starvation and less selection for traits that conferred superior resource acquisition, but other things, such as sexual selection, would become vastly more important. Also birth rates would fall among organisms. Use some humans somewhere as a example of unlimited food being conferred on the organism. In a limited sense no one starves, but there are other environmental stresses and sexual selection is strong among humans. The food chain among other organisms would change and perhaps less variance would occur with less birth, but other environmental factors would still be in place here.
Technically, I think that the domestication of dogs was a product of both natural and artificial selection. It probably started out naturally, with wolves living in close proximity to humans and scavenging from their waste, gradually becoming adapted to co-existing with human populations. Wolf populations living in close proximity to human settlements might adapt to them in a way similar to what happens with predation: humans would hunt and kill off the more aggressive packs, unwittingly ensuring that the surviving packs would be more timid, more prone to domestication. Then humans began taking wolves into their households, for whatever reason, and training their captive offspring. Though there might not at this point have been conscious efforts to breed gentler wolves, nevertheless at this point we should speak of artificial selection rather than natural selection: misbehaving captive wolves would be killed, the more docile survivors would breed. But that's just one hypothesis. Most hypotheses will go along the same global lines though.
A simplified example of mating behavior. If young men wanted old women as mates their genes would be selected out, as they would have few children to pass those genes to, until negative frequency selection reduced these allele in the gene pool. Men who desire young, fertile women as mates leave many descendents that carry the genes for this trait. So, over generations the mating behavior of men is shaped. and stabilizing selection keeps this mating trait/allele at high frequency in the populations gene pool.
Here is a diagram showing the process of natural selection: https://bioteaching.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/img1.jpg
Survival of the fittest would be used to describe this situation.
Survival of the fittest
can u describe the basic principles of training of u're sfuff in catering
The knowledge obtained by observing natural events and conditions in order to discover facts and formulate laws or principles that can be verified or tested.
What population? Perhaps you mean if there were no variation for natural selection to select from.
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by 'distributive'. I would describe natural selection as a filter. Imagine the gene pool of a population as a puddle of water, spreading across an even floor. Natural selection brings unevenness to that floor, limiting the spread of the water in some directions, promoting it in others - giving evolution direction.
Directional selection
"Biographic" or "biographical" refers to an account of a person's life, and I see no reason why this theory would contradict any such account.
Yes, that would be called the Homologous structure, and that changes in natural selection.
Survival of the fittest would be used to describe this situation.
Yes it does. Without variance in the organisms genome, that gives variance to the phenotype, there would be nothing for natural selection to select from.