0
How do the constitution full faith and credit clause and its privileges and immunities clause make it easier for citizens to move from state to another?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
"Full faith and credit" means that whenever you make a contract (like a marriage license in one state, it is recognized in all other states. The same for "privileges and immunities" whatever is recognized in one state, will carry over to the next. If you are immune from prosecution in one state, you are more than likely immune in whatever state you move to, but at the same time, if you will BE prosecuted in one state, we have extradition laws so that if you move to another state, you will be apprehended and given back to the state where you committed the crime.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Article IV of the Constitution obligates states to give this to one another's citizens?
The United States Constitution, in Article 4, obligates states to provide privileges and immunities to one another's citizens. The U.S. Constitution was created on September 17, 1787.
What does article iv of the constitution obligates states to give this to one another citizens?
privleges and immunities
What does article 4 section 2 clause 1 prevent?
Article 4, Section 2, Clause 1, prevents another state from lowering or removing the rights of citizens from another state.The wording of it is: "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States."
Does the constitution protect citizens or all people living in the US?
Excellent but difficult question. The Supreme Court interprets the Constitution, and there is a lot unsaid in the Constitution. It was not possible, nor was it the plan, for the Constitution to cover any possible issue that might arise. Article IV Section 2 says: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed in the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime. The 14th Amendment Paragraph 1 says: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The Article IV material has to do with each state giving credit to the public acts of every other state. It makes specific reference to Citizens. The reference to non-citizens (A Person charged...) relates not to Privileges and Immunities, but to the States' rights to demand the return of anyone charged with a crime. The 14th Amendment defines citizenship. Again, the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution, it is not open to private interpretation. But it does appear that while any person in the US should enjoy basic rights that any person anywhere should have (Declaration), certain Privileges and Immunities seem to be reserved for citizens. This seems reasonable; the United States is a Sovereign State, and has the right and power (given by the People) to establish laws and enforce the rule of law. Privileges and Immunities of citizenship are not (and should not be) simply extended to anyone who crosses our borders. No nation on earth does that.
Which article of the constitution mandates that if a person charged with a crime flees state and is found in another state they must be extradited to the state of jurisdiction of the crime?
Article Four deals with relationship of states, full faith and credit clause, privileges and immunities clause and extradition
Are citizens in one state entitled to the same privileges as a citizen in another state?
yes
Was Dred Scott a legal citizen of Missouri?
Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)Not according to the US Supreme Court. In an opinion authored by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, African-Americans could never be citizens of the United States or, by extension, individual states.Justices John McLean and Benjamin R. Curtis dissented from this opinion, disagreeing with Taney's interpretation of the Constitution.Taney wrote:"A free negro of the African race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a "citizen" within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States."When the Constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the States as members of the community which constituted the State, and were not numbered among its people or citizens. Consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. And not being "citizens" within the meaning of the Constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the United States, and the Circuit Court has not jurisdiction in such a suit."The only two clauses in the Constitution which point to this race treat them as persons whom it was morally lawfully to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves."Since the adoption of the Constitution of the United States, no State can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the United States, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument."A State, by its laws passed since the adoption of the Constitution, may put a foreigner or any other description of persons upon a footing with its own citizens as to all the rights and privileges enjoyed by them within its dominion and by its laws. But that will not make him a citizen of the United States, nor entitle him to sue in its courts, nor to any of the privileges and immunities of a citizen in another State."
What does article 4 section 1 of the us constitution have to do with a drivers license or birth certificate?
Article 4 of the Constitution states the responsibilities of states to other states. States must give full faith and credit to the acts of other states. For instance if the drivers license is issued by one state it is supposed to be recognized as legal and binding by another. (no one can tell you you can't buy cigarettes with a Washington ID in Oregon.) no state may deny privileges or immunities to out-of-state citizens by refusing their fundamental rights.
What is the interstate comity?
Interstate comity refers to the principle of mutual respect and recognition among different states. It involves one state honoring the laws and judicial decisions of another state, promoting cooperation and harmony between states. This principle helps facilitate interstate relations and ensures consistency in legal matters across state boundaries.
Has the state constitution of Arkansas been amended to prohibit same-sex marriage in that state?
Yes, in November 2004, but that amendment was struck down by the United States Supreme Court on June 26, 2015. The amendment used to say:Marriage. Marriage consists only of the union of one man and one woman.Marital status. Legal status for unmarried persons which is identical or substantially similar to marital status shall not be valid or recognized in Arkansas, except that the legislature may recognize a common law marriage from another state between a man and a woman.Capacity, rights, obligations, privileges, and immunities. The legislature has the power to determine the capacity of persons to marry, subject to this amendment, and the legal rights, obligations, privileges, and immunities of marriage.
When citizens move from one state to another state what happens to their rights under the constitution?
their rights remain unchanged
When citizens move from one state to another state what happens to their right under the constitution?
their rights remain unchanged
