answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

it helps alot of the issues

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do the federalists arguments in support of government power reflect issues facing Americans today?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How did president Jefferson inaugural address reflect his belief about government?

In President's Jefferson's inaugural address he did reflect his belief about government by saying we "are all Republicans and we are all Federalists."


How should the federal government budget to reflect Americans priorities?

By making an effort to service it's national debt and by putting an end to its military misadventures across the globe.


How does the constitution reflect principle of limited government?

The government only has the powers given to it by the Constitution.


What are the arguments against the electoral college?

The biggest argument against the electoral college is that the electoral vote does not always reflect the preference of the majority of the population.


What does Robert E. Lee's Letter to his son reflect about Americans view in the 1860?

What does Robert E. Lee's "Letter to His Son" reflect about Americans' views in the 1860s? A. Some Americans felt more loyalty to their state than to the United States. B. True patriots were willing to sacrifice their lives for their country. C. People rarely identified themselves as Americans.


All the laws of the government reflect the policies of the majority party?

it is false


How does the constitution reflect the fear of a strong central government?

No one CARES!


What was the difference between the federalist and the democratic party?

Federalists wanted to support England and also wanted a strong and powerful government, a national bank, and a loose interpretation of the Coast. The Democratic-Republicans wanted to support France and also wanted a small federal government, no national bank, and a strict interpretation of the Coast.


In what way does India's government reflect the principle of separation of powers?

Somehow. -Anonymous


What did the anti-federalists stand for?

TheAnti - Federalists stood for a strong state government and either a weaker or equal national government thus the supremacy clause contradicted the anti - federalist view of government. They believed that Congress's limitless power to tax that is found in Constitution would infringe on the citizen's rights. Also they believed that the national government should not be allowed to have a standing army in times of peace. Lastly, the necessary and proper clause worried the anti - federalists because this gave power an unlimited source of power that some founders were afraid would be abused. Basically, the anti - federalist's had reasonable reservations about the ratification of the Constitution.


How did the arguments of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists reflect their points of view regarding natural rights republicanism and constitutionalism?

The federalist are those who favored a stronger national government due to their fear caused by the weak Articles of Confederation. Therefore, they were more loose constructionist meaning that they took the words of the constitution loosely so that the federal government has more opportunity. The anti-federalist were strong believers in natural rights and the rights of the states to determine what they wanted because each state was extremely different. Anti-federalist still had a bad taste in their mouth from the American Revolution and feared that a strong federal government would turn into a monarchy. Therefore, the anti-federalist pushed for the Bill of Rights which helped the people keep some of their power. Americans had recently fought a war to secure their fundamental rights. The anti-federalist did not want a constitution that put those rights in jeopardy. They also were strict constructionist meaning that they interpreted the constitution word by word. The anti-federalist refused to sign the constitution until there was a promise of the bill of rights. Many Founding Fathers were influenced by Locke, his natural rights philosophy of inalienable rights: life, liberty, property regardless of wealth, social status or birth. If government failed to protect those rights the people had the rights to rebel and replace it.


How did the arguments of the Federalists and Anti Federalists reflect their points of view regarding natural rights republicanism and constitutionalism?

The federalist are those who favored a stronger national government due to their fear caused by the weak Articles of Confederation. Therefore, they were more loose constructionist meaning that they took the words of the constitution loosely so that the federal government has more opportunity. The anti-federalist were strong believers in natural rights and the rights of the states to determine what they wanted because each state was extremely different. Anti-federalist still had a bad taste in their mouth from the American Revolution and feared that a strong federal government would turn into a monarchy. Therefore, the anti-federalist pushed for the Bill of Rights which helped the people keep some of their power. Americans had recently fought a war to secure their fundamental rights. The anti-federalist did not want a constitution that put those rights in jeopardy. They also were strict constructionist meaning that they interpreted the constitution word by word. The anti-federalist refused to sign the constitution until there was a promise of the bill of rights. Many Founding Fathers were influenced by Locke, his natural rights philosophy of inalienable rights: life, liberty, property regardless of wealth, social status or birth. If government failed to protect those rights the people had the rights to rebel and replace it.