0
How did the arguments of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists reflect their points of view regarding natural rights republicanism and constitutionalism?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
The federalist are those who favored a stronger national government due to their fear caused by the weak Articles of Confederation. Therefore, they were more loose constructionist meaning that they took the words of the constitution loosely so that the federal government has more opportunity. The anti-federalist were strong believers in natural rights and the rights of the states to determine what they wanted because each state was extremely different. Anti-federalist still had a bad taste in their mouth from the American Revolution and feared that a strong federal government would turn into a monarchy. Therefore, the anti-federalist pushed for the Bill of Rights which helped the people keep some of their power. Americans had recently fought a war to secure their fundamental rights. The anti-federalist did not want a constitution that put those rights in jeopardy. They also were strict constructionist meaning that they interpreted the constitution word by word. The anti-federalist refused to sign the constitution until there was a promise of the bill of rights.
Many Founding Fathers were influenced by Locke, his natural rights philosophy of inalienable rights: life, liberty, property regardless of wealth, social status or birth. If government failed to protect those rights the people had the rights to rebel and replace it.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What were the weaknesses in the Anti-Federalists' arguments against the Constitution?
Articles of Confederation and Shay's Rebellion Even though they didn't like the constitution, they didn't have a solution for their problem. you could use Thomas Hobbs and say that people in general are self interested there are a lot more you just have to look it up.
Describe the arguments used to justify and oppose secession?
The arguments used to justify and oppose secession
what was true of federalists?
They believed the national government should be stronger than the states
What are the arguments for and against celibacy?
Celibacy is abstinence from sex or sexual relations. There are arguments for it to protect people from unwanted pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases and religious purity. There are arguments against it saying that it is restrictive and that it goes against following the laws of nature.
Interpreting this document led to arguments?
constitution
The federalists or the antifederalists had the more valid arguments?
There is no doubt that the Anti-Federalist had some very valid arguments but in many ways, their principles seemed to be flawed. The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution was an attempt to fuse the government into one nation and for them this would undermine any authority the states had. The contention of this argument was on the basis that, "there was an inherent connection between the states and the preservation of individual liberty, which is the end of any legitimate government.
Identify and explain two arguments made by the federalists and explain how the anti-federalists countered each of these arguments?
The answer can be found within your AP gov't book Butcher gave you.
Compare the arguments for and against the Constitution made by the Federalists and Antifederalists during the struggle over ratification?
The main agreements between the antifederalist and the federalist were about the bill of rights and the need for a government. The antifederalist demanded to have a bill of rights because it can explain the ideals described in the Declaration of Independence better than the Constitution because the bill of rights gives us freedom of press, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. Also, the federalist felt like it was important to have a government. They both disagreed. This is right luv
Describe and justify the position of the anti-Federalists regarding the opening phrase of the Constitution you the People of the US?
Differing views on these questions brought into existence two parties, the Federalists, who favored a strong central government, and the Antifederalists, who preferred a loose association of separate states. Impassioned arguments on both sides were voiced by the press, the legislatures, and the state conventions. In Virginia, the Antifederalists attacked the proposed new government by challenging the opening phrase of the Constitution: "We the People of the United States." Without using the individual state names in the Constitution, the delegates argued, the states would not retain their separate rights or powers. Virginia Antifederalists were led by Patrick Henry, who became the chief spokesman for back-country farmers who feared the powers of the new central government. Wavering delegates were persuaded by a proposal that the Virginia convention recommend a bill of rights, and Antifederalists joined with the Federalists to ratify the Constitution on June 25.
Who rejected the arguments for absolute authority and argued for the notion of a social contract between ruler and subjects to provide a foundation for Constitutionalism?
John Locke
What arguments did the federalists publish in reply to these fears?
In order to know what arguments the Federalist published in reply to certain fears more information is needed such as what their fears were.
What arguments did federalists publish in reply to these fears?
In order to know what arguments the Federalist published in reply to certain fears more information is needed such as what their fears were.
What strategies made the federalist arguments of the constitution successful?
promise of a bill of rights and compromise with anti-federalists
What arguments did the federalists make to support ratification of the Constitution?
The federalists made a number of arguments to support the ratification of the constitution. They preferred a strong national government since they believed that if the states had too much power it would result into so many other confederacy governments within the states.
How do the federalists arguments in support of government power reflect issues facing Americans today?
it helps alot of the issues
What were the antifederalists major arguments againts the constitution?
the answer is . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Keep gooing . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . Just a little more . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .Your almost there . . .. . .. . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .Congratulations ur here . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .woops nope . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ,. . .. . . wait yesah. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. The answer is I DONT KNOW
What arguments did the the federalists make to gain approval of the Constitution?
The Federalist argued that the constitution needed to be ratified in order to correct the issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalist focused their arguments on the benefits of a national government.
