0
promise of a Bill of Rights and compromise with anti-federalists
What else can I help you with?
The Federalist Papers presented strong and convincing arguments in favor of?
adopting the constitution
What major arguments did the anti Federalist offer in opposition to ratification of the constitution?
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
How did federalist and democratic republicans next to the situation in France?
They besided one another with arguments and restrainment.
What do the federalist papers mean in modern English?
Your question must be directed to the role and value of the Federalist Papers as a whole, I suspect, because otherwise the answer would require a minutely detailed dissection of those letter that constitute the Federalist. The Federalist Papers offer the arguments in support of the ratification of the Constitution of 1787, proposed by the Constitutional Convention that met in Philadelphia. Today, they are one key source of understanding of the milieu that gave rise to the 1787 Convention and the document produced by it, of understanding of the scope and meaning of the provisions of that document, and of understanding the arguments made against that document and rebutted in the Federalist Papers. Moreover, they are quite the persuasive source on meaning when they speak relevantly to an issue in dispute today. To win ratification of the United States Constitution in New York state, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote a series of newspaper articles, under assumed names, in order to convince the public to support the new Constitution. The purpose of the articles was to explain and defend the writing of the Constitution. 85 articles were written between 1787-1788. The articles probably had little influence on New York approving the Constitution, but the essays have had a lasting value as authoritative explanations of the sections of the Constitution. The Federalist Papers, as they were called, have become the single most important piece of American political philosophy ever produced in America. Wikipedia has information about the Federalist Papers and many are explained in modern English. MrV
What was the main purpose of the federalist papers during the constitutional period?
The main purpose of the Federalist Papers was to promote the ratification of the U.S. Constitution by addressing concerns and arguments against it. Written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, these essays aimed to explain the Constitution's principles, the necessity of a strong central government, and the safeguards against tyranny. They sought to persuade skeptics by articulating the benefits of a unified federal system and the mechanisms for checks and balances within the government. Overall, the papers played a crucial role in shaping public opinion and fostering support for the new Constitution.
What arguments did the the federalists make to gain approval of the Constitution?
The Federalist argued that the constitution needed to be ratified in order to correct the issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalist focused their arguments on the benefits of a national government.
The Federalist Papers presented strong and convincing arguments in favor of?
adopting the constitution
Arguments for or agents the constitution?
created a strong national government(arguments for) Article of federalist was against because they believe to much power in the hand of big government.
What major arguments did the anti Federalist offer in opposition to ratification of the constitution?
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
What 3 main arguments of the Federalists and the Anti- Federalist?
they supported the right to tax the country, the ratification of the constitution, and they supported a strong central [federal] government
How did the anti federalist present their arguments?
by loling
What arguments did the anti federalist use against them?
to babble
What were the two arguments over the constitution?
Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison discussed the Constitution in the Federalist Papers. Thomas Jefferson led the opposition because the Constitution did not speak about individual rights. James Madison wrote the Bill of Rights and a compromise was reached.
What was the main argument of the federalist papers?
The Federalist argued that the constitution needed to be ratified in order to correct the issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalist focused their arguments on the benefits of a national government.
Who did the Federalist papers influence?
The Federalist Papers primarily influenced the framers of the U.S. Constitution and the American public during the ratification debates in the late 18th century. Authored by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, these essays aimed to advocate for the adoption of the Constitution and clarify its principles. Their arguments helped shape political thought and contributed to the establishment of a strong federal government. The Federalist Papers continue to be referenced in legal and political discussions today.
Main arguments used by the anti federalist?
Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?
What were the main arguments used by anti-federalist?
Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?
