Surely justice is supposed to do exactly what it says on the tin ! The shape & size of the tin doesn't matter. If it ain't right it ain't Justice. Similarly the system that any jurisdiction uses is irrelevant to the question: Justice is about fairness & balance. If the jurisdiction does not arrive at a fair & balanced result then justice is denied. I can see no other outcome irrespective of the political system. Justice is beyond political influence, if it is not then justice it is not.
In capitalism, the justice system emphasizes the protection of individual rights and private property. It tends to prioritize free markets and competition, with punishments aimed at compensating victims and deterring future crime. In socialism, the justice system focuses on social justice and equality. It tends to prioritize the collective well-being and aims to address systemic injustices through redistributive measures, rehabilitation, and reintegration of offenders into society.
Capitalism allows for more freedom for businesses than socialism does
Both socialism and capitalism involve economic systems where goods and services are produced and distributed, but they differ in terms of ownership and distribution of resources. In socialism, the means of production are owned and controlled by the state or the community, whereas in capitalism, they are owned by individuals or private companies. Additionally, both systems aim to improve the living standards of their citizens, but they have different approaches to achieving this goal.
Deng created an economy that blended socialism and capitalism.
Capitalism allows for more freedom for businesses than socialism does
Capitalism allows for more freedom for businesses than socialism does
The United States wanted to spread democracy and capitalism while the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics wanted to spread communism and socialism.
Under Socialism, the employees control the factories and there is no class system, in theory. Under capitalism, the owners control the factories and acquire wealth much more freely. Well most countries around the world are in favor of capitalism over socialism. In capiatalism store owners benefit. Its mainly those who work hard get their money. For example if you work for so many hours you get paid a certain wage because you earned it. In socialism wealth is spread to everyone. Everyone would be middle class.
Bill
What is the basic elements of the South African trial systems and how do they differ from other systems?
All three are economic systems, or modes of production. More broadly they can be described as socioeconomic systems, although the term "Communism" with a big C has been used to refer to countries run by Communist parties in the 20th century and thus to a form of government rather than an economic system. Ownership: Capitalism is based on private ownership, Socialism on co-operative ownership, and Communism on common ownership (or open-access, i.e; non-ownership and is thus more distinct than the other two). Socialism is based on the principle of "to each according to his contribution", whereas capitalism is also nominally based on that principle along with the idea that one should be rewarded based on how much capital one holds. Communism is more radically different from socialism and capitalism by being based on "to each according to his need", which basically means free-access in a hypothetical post-scarcity economy. Capitalism is based on markets, money (value), and the state. Socialism might be based on markets or planning, replaces money (value) with labour credits or another measure of value, and retains the state. In contrast, Communism is a post-market, moneyless, stateless and classless hypothetical society. Socialism and capitalism are a lot more similar to each other than either are to Communism because communism is postulated on a hypothetical economic state of post-scarcity.
i fish
== ==