Want this question answered?
Many things can hinder a journalist's investigation. People might not be willing to talk. Laws might protect the privacy of an individual. Other sources the journalist is trying to use might have false information. It is up to the journalist to sift through what is fiction and find the truth.
The NSA's surveillance programs were implemented as a means to gather intelligence on potential security threats in efforts to protect national security. However, concerns arose due to the overreach of these programs, particularly in regards to the invasion of privacy of innocent individuals.
Yes that is an invasion of privacy unless you get an search warrrent or you think someone is cheating or stealing
Many people think of it as an invasion of privacy.
It would be seen as a grave invasion of privacy.
assayrians :p
assayrians :p
That depends on where the cameras are and do they have a warrant. If the camera is on public location and is directed to shoot the streets and not to people's homes, then they are not considered invasion of privacy. If the camera-operator is an agent of police and has a warrant to pry a private home, then the prying is part of an ongoing investigation and must aim to a legal action to catch a criminal.
Although copyright law wouldn't protect your image, you may be protected by privacy laws, depending on the circumstances under which the video was filmed, and whether you had a "reasonable expectation of privacy" at the time.
It means that there can be ... when I speak to the right people. I will explain. But for now it means invasion of privacy. amen
They could give them citizenship to their country.
Tape record WHAT? Other people's conversations (without them knowing it or giving permission)? No, it is not - it's an invasion of privacy.