The African nations were fighting for political freedom from colonial forces, but Israel and Palestine have been fighting for control of the same land.
The population exchange between India and Pakistan was similar in many ways to the population exchange between Israel and the Arab World in the wake of Israeli Independence. However, the intransigence of the Muslim-majority party in each circumstance (Pakistan and the Arab World) to accept the facts on the ground after the exchange has led to numerous military confrontations.
India successfully won independence but Palestine and Israel continues their conflict over land
There was no large conflict after Nigeria gained independence in 1960. The Nigerian Civil War was their main conflict, however it did not start until 1967
It never was a global conflict.
same same
None, really. The French Revolution (1787-1799) was barely noticeable, as it happened to France, and European power; as most of Latin America was within the sphere of influence of Spain and Portugal, these territories weren't affected by such conflict.
The conflict in general is called the Arab-Israeli Conflict. The particular war that erupted due to the Arab Rejection of Israel's Declaration of Independence was the Arab-Israeli War of 1948-9, alternately called the Nakba by Arabs and the Independence War by Israelis.
India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.
India successfully won its independence, but Palestine and Israel continue their conflict over land.
Answer this question… India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.
The main reason is probably the fact that Israel still exists, and shows no sign of being willing to evaporate.
The Algerian War, or in Guerre d'Algérie, was a conflict between France and Algerian independence movements from 1954 to 1962, which led to Algeria gaining its independence from France.
Answer this question… India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.
Conflict motivation refers to the reasons behind why individuals or groups engage in conflict. These motivations can include personal interests, competition for resources, power struggles, or differences in values or beliefs. Understanding conflict motivations can help in resolving conflicts effectively.
no, independence increased the conflict in Northern Ireland
India experienced conflict as a result of core religious differences, while Vietnam fought over political differences.
India experienced conflict as a result of core religious differences, while Vietnam fought over political differences - APEX
Yes, in many cases, understanding the motivations of individuals or groups involved in a conflict can provide crucial insights into the causes and dynamics of the conflict. Motivations can stem from various factors such as power struggles, resource competition, identity issues, or historical grievances, which can all play a significant role in driving and perpetuating conflicts. Identifying these motivations can help in developing more effective strategies for conflict resolution and peacebuilding.
There was no large conflict after Nigeria gained independence in 1960. The Nigerian Civil War was their main conflict, however it did not start until 1967