0
The mountain belts along the margins of North America, Africa and Europe line up as well and have similar rock types, indication that the continents at one time were joined as Pangea.
What else can I help you with?
How do mountain chains in Europe specifically on the British Isles and Scandinavia provide evidence for the existence of Pangaea?
Mountain chains in Europe, particularly in the British Isles and Scandinavia, provide evidence for the existence of Pangaea through their geological similarities and alignment. The Caledonian mountain range, which extends from Scotland to Scandinavia, showcases similar rock types and ages, indicating they were once part of a continuous landmass. Additionally, the distribution of fossils and geological features across these regions supports the idea that these areas were connected before the continents drifted apart during the formation of Pangaea. This evidence highlights the historical geological processes that shaped the continents and their current configurations.
How mountain chains provide evidence for the existence of pangaea?
The mountain belts along the margins of North America, Africa and Europe line up as well and have similar rock types, indication that the continents at one time were joined as Pangea.
What clues are useful reconstructing Pangaea?
Some clues useful for reconstructing Pangaea include similarities in rock formations and fossils across different continents, matching mountain ranges and coastlines, and geologic evidence such as glacial striations that suggest movement of continents. Additionally, the fit of continental shelves and distribution of certain plant and animal species provide further evidence for the existence of Pangaea.
Are the Appalachian mountains evidence of Pangaea?
Yes, the Appalachian Mountains provide evidence of Pangaea, as their geological features and formations share similarities with mountain ranges in Europe and Africa, suggesting they were once part of the same landmass. The Appalachian Mountains were formed during the collision of tectonic plates when Pangaea was assembled, leading to significant geological activity. Moreover, fossil records and rock types in the Appalachians match those found in other regions that were once connected. This supports the theory of continental drift and the existence of Pangaea.
How do mountain chains provide evidence that Pangaea existed?
Mountain chains on different continents have similar rock types and structures, indicating they were once connected. This suggests that the continents were once part of a single landmass, Pangaea, which broke apart through plate tectonics. Matching mountain chains on different continents support the theory of continental drift and the existence of Pangaea.
How did mesosaurus and lystrosaurus provide evidence of Pangaea's existence?
Mesosaurus and Lystrosaurus provided evidence for the existence of Pangaea through their fossil distributions. Mesosaurus, a freshwater reptile, was found in both South America and Africa, suggesting these continents were once connected, as it could not have traversed the vast ocean separating them. Similarly, Lystrosaurus fossils were discovered in Antarctica, Africa, and India, indicating that these landmasses were once part of a larger supercontinent. The presence of these identical species across distant continents supports the theory of continental drift and the existence of Pangaea.
What rock types support the therory of pangaea?
The distribution of similar rock types across continents that were once part of Pangaea, such as the Appalachian mountains in North America aligning with the Caledonian mountains in Europe and North Africa, supports the theory of Pangaea. Additionally, identical fossils, coal deposits, and rock formations found on different continents provide further evidence for the existence of the supercontinent Pangaea.
Why did most scientists not believe in Pangaea?
Because the earth was thought to be made by god, and it was perfect and no continental crusts. The existence of continental crusts is one of the many evidence that proved Pangaea to be a theory. Also, the existence of the fossil records of the same species along the coastlines of 2 different places confirms Pangea. The current movements in earth's crust also provide evidence that Pangaea could have formed. Most scientists were not given this data and therefore the evidence for Pangaea was vague. Only now has the evidence shown more consistency. Science is skeptical my friend.
What evidence prove that Pangaea didn't existed?
Evidence such as the distribution of fossils, rock formations, and magnetic fields on different continents support the theory of continental drift and the breakup of Pangaea. The matching geological features, such as mountain ranges and coastlines, on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean provide further evidence that the continents were once connected. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates and the ongoing process of plate tectonics help explain the separation of the continents from Pangaea.
What clues are useful i reconstructing pangaea?
Clues useful in reconstructing Pangaea include the matching shapes of continents' coastlines, similarities in rock formations and fossils across continents, and the alignment of mountain ranges and geological structures. Additionally, paleoclimatic evidence such as glacial deposits and ancient climate patterns can provide further support for the theory of Pangaea.
How glaciers provided evidence for the existence of pangaea?
Glaciers provide evidence for the existence of Pangaea through glacial deposits and striations found in regions now located near the equator, such as Africa, South America, and India. These remnants indicate that these continents were once situated closer to the poles, where glacial activity could occur. Additionally, the alignment of rock layers and the presence of similar glacial features across continents support the idea of these landmasses being part of a single supercontinent. This evidence aligns with the theory of continental drift, which suggests that Pangaea existed around 335 million years ago.
How does science provide evidence for the existence of God?
Science does not provide direct evidence for the existence of God as it focuses on natural phenomena and observable data. The existence of God is a matter of faith and belief, which is beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.
