.model small
.stack
.data
.code
main proc
mov al,10
mov bl,15
add al, bl
start:
mov cx,8
mov bl,'1'
test bl,10000000b
mov ah,09h
int 21h
next:
shl bl,1
mov dl,1
mov ah,09h
int 21h
mov ah,4ch
int 21h
main endp
end start
end
mov eax, 3 ; eax now contains the value 3
mov ebx, 4 ; ebx now contains the value 4
add eax, ebx ; eax now contains the value 3+4=7
Platform-dependent. Example for /360:
L R1,value1
L R2,value2
AR R1,R2
ST R1,result
...
value1 DC F'1'
value2 DC F'2'
result DS F
Assembly uses commands you can begin to understand, like JSR (Jump to subroutine which changes points in a code) machine code on the other hand is the code that the machine reads. This would only look like numbers to you, probably in hex code. Basically the higher level a language is the easier to understand because of the level of abstraction. It goes, machine code, assembly language, then things like C then java or visual basic. In VB you can write commands almost the same as you would construct an English sentence, the compiler then converts this down to machine code which the processor can understand and execute. Got it?
Assembly language is more human-readable than machine language. Generally, statements in assembly language are written using short codes for the instruction and arguments, such as "MOV $12 SP", as opposed to machine language, where everything is written as numbers. Assembly language can have comments and macros as well, to ease programming and understanding. Generally, programs called "assemblers" transform assembly language to machine language. This is a relatively straightforward process, there being a clear 1-to-1 transformation between assembly and machine language. This is as opposed to compilers, which do a complicated transformation between high-level language and assembly. -------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSEMBLY is the key word to define the difference between Machine Language and Assembly. . Assembly language assembles steps of MACHINE CODE into SUB-ROUTINES defined by simple text words: Such as: the assembly command 'ADD' may represents 20-30 machine commands.
Generally languages are used for communication, In the case of computers languages are used to communicate with the Hardware. Language consist of set of rules and syntaxes to frame the valid instructions to work with the Machines.
Digital
0000 0001 0010 0011 0100 0101
Machine language is the actual instructions in computer memory that are fetched into the processor and executed. It is directly executable and consists of what look to most human beings like a bunch of hexadecimal numbers, though a few geeks such as myself can tell it is code instead of numbers. For example, the instructions executing interrupt 21, service 10, are: B410 CD21 Assembly language is a human readable as mnemonics, it translates on a one for one basis into machine language. The computer cannot execute assembly language directly, but human beings who are trained can understand it. The assembly language equivalent of the above instructions is: MOV AH,10 ; prepare for service 10 by putting 10 into AH INT 21 ; vectors into code established in the interrupt table
Machine language is the actual bits used to control the processor in the computer, usually viewed as a sequence of hexadecimal numbers (typically bytes). The processor reads these bits in from program memory, and the bits represent "instructions" as to what to do next.Thus machine language provides a way of entering instructions into a computer (whether through switches, punched tape, or a binary file).Assembly language is a more human readable view of machine language. Instead of representing the machine language as numbers, the instructions and registers are given names (typically abbreviated words, or mnemonics, eg ld means "load"). Unlike a high level language, assembler is very close to the machine language. The main abstractions (apart from the mnemonics) are the use of labels instead of fixed memory addresses, and comments.An assembly language program (ie a text file) is translated to machine language by an assembler. A disassemblerperforms the reverse function (although the comments and the names of labels will have been discarded in the assembler process).machine language faster than assembly language even than assembly language depend upon machine language
write an assembly language program to find sum of N numbers
A machine language is called as machine code and it is represented as binary numbers 0 and 1
It are machine code and Assembly.
Assembly language is 1 step above machine language. In assembly language you can use mnemonics to represent what you want to do. For example, to compare two numbers together I could represent the sequence as:L R1, Value1 load the first valueC R1, Value2 compare against the second valueJG First first value greater than secondAs you can see, there is some symbology here that allows me to determine what the program logic is doing. Note that the above code is not understandable to a computer circuit; it has to be translated to machine code. And that is what assembly code is; a symbolic human representation of what the machine is supposed to do.Machine code on the other hand, is usually the targeted result of translating assembly code to the machine equivalent. The machine circuit only understands a sequence of zeros and ones, and is not immediately understandable to a human. The result of the program sequence above in machine code might look something like:111001101101100000111100011000101010Which makes sense to a machine, but not a human.
Yes.
fish
Assembly uses commands you can begin to understand, like JSR (Jump to subroutine which changes points in a code) machine code on the other hand is the code that the machine reads. This would only look like numbers to you, probably in hex code. Basically the higher level a language is the easier to understand because of the level of abstraction. It goes, machine code, assembly language, then things like C then java or visual basic. In VB you can write commands almost the same as you would construct an English sentence, the compiler then converts this down to machine code which the processor can understand and execute. Got it?
Assembly language is more human-readable than machine language. Generally, statements in assembly language are written using short codes for the instruction and arguments, such as "MOV $12 SP", as opposed to machine language, where everything is written as numbers. Assembly language can have comments and macros as well, to ease programming and understanding. Generally, programs called "assemblers" transform assembly language to machine language. This is a relatively straightforward process, there being a clear 1-to-1 transformation between assembly and machine language. This is as opposed to compilers, which do a complicated transformation between high-level language and assembly. -------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSEMBLY is the key word to define the difference between Machine Language and Assembly. . Assembly language assembles steps of MACHINE CODE into SUB-ROUTINES defined by simple text words: Such as: the assembly command 'ADD' may represents 20-30 machine commands.
Generally languages are used for communication, In the case of computers languages are used to communicate with the Hardware. Language consist of set of rules and syntaxes to frame the valid instructions to work with the Machines.
Assembly language programe for multiplication