The Roman symbol for zero is N coming from the Latin word nullae meaning nothing. V/VIII = VI/X+II/C+V/M = DC/M+XX/M+V/M = DCXXV/M = N.DCXXV (0.625). 5/8 = 6/10+2/100+5/1000 = 600/1000+20/1000+5/1000 = 625/1000 = 0.625. Alternative information The Romans had no symbol for zero as they never used it. A symbol was first used in the late 8th century by Christian monks who wrote in Latin and needed a symbol for zero, so they chose 'N' the initial letter of Nullae (nothing).
Converting five-eighths into decimals using only Roman numerals is not possible because Roman numerals were not designed to represent decimal fractions. Roman numerals were mainly used for whole numbers and not for representing fractional values.
Yes
The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numerals are possible.
You'll find the possible answer in the question: What are the numbers from 1 to a 1000000 in Roman numerals?
6.530 and 6.5299... recurring are two possible answers.
Decimal points aren't positive or negative. Decimals can be either.
Yes
The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numerals are possible.
You'll find the possible answer in the question: What are the numbers from 1 to a 1000000 in Roman numerals?
It really not possible. Other wise it will be in decimals.
1.48000, and 1.47999... are two possible answers.
3.70000 and 3.6999... (recurring) are two possible answers.
6.530 and 6.5299... recurring are two possible answers.
Decimal points aren't positive or negative. Decimals can be either.
The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numeral is possible.
There are infinitely many possible answers. One pair is 14.825 and -2.
It shows all possible combinations of genes that can result.
Not possible unless you go into decimals. Even then I'm not sure if it's possible. 46 = 13+15+17.