There are basically two types of digital computer architectures. The first one is called Von Neumann architecture and later Harvard architecture was adopted for designing digital computers.
Von Neumann Architecture:
Harvard Architecture:
However modern computers use a bit of both, making it hard to classify them. Usually the processor core is isolated from directly accessing main memory by cache memory, which is usually divided into instruction and data cache. Thus the processor core itself is implemented as a Harvard architecture, but since both instruction and data cache interface to one common memory system the machine runs as if it was a Von Neumann architecture.
Differentiate between a simple bridge and transparent bridge
: Differentiate between quantitative and real time PCR.
Nothing they are the same
It doesn't.
science is a study of community and technology is a kind of material
difference between von neumann and harvard machine
In the Von Neumann (not "von humann") architecture instructions and data share the same bus and address space, while in the Harvard architecture instructions and data are accessed through separate buses.
there is no dif
In a von Neumann architecture, program and data are stored in the same memory and managed by the same information-handling subsystem. In the Harvard architecture, program and data are stored and handled by different subsystems. This is the essential difference between the two architectures. In the original "Harvard computer", built in 1944 and for which the architecture is named, the program-handling task and the data-handling task were sufficiently different to result in two different storage technologies. Today, the vast majority of computers are von Neumann architecture because of the efficiencies gained in designing, implementing, and operating one memory system instead of two. However, in some niches, particularly certain embedded applications where the program is more-or-less hard wired, task requirements are such that the Harvard architecture can provide distinct operational advantages. Under certain conditions, a Harvard computer can be much faster than a von Neumann computer because data and program do not contend for the same information pathway, and storing the program in an immutable read-only memory can result in vast reliability improvements.
Harvard architecture:The original Harvard architecture computer, the Harvard Mark I, employed entirely separate memory systems to store instructions and data. The CPU fetched the next instruction and loaded or stored data simultaneously and independently. This is by contrast with a Von Neumann architecture computer, in which both instructions and data are stored in the same memory system and (without the complexity of a cache) must be accessed in turn. The physical separation of instruction and data memory is sometimes held to be the distinguishing feature of modern Harvard architecture computers. However, with entire computer systems being integrated onto single chips, the use of different memory technologies for instructions (e.g. Flash memory) and data (typically read/write memory) in Von Neumann machines is becoming popular. The true distinction of a Harvard machine is that instruction and data memory occupy different address spaces. In other words, a memory address does not uniquely identify a storage location (as it does in a Von Neumann machine); you also need to know the memory space (instruction or data) to which the address applies.Modified Harvard architecture:A pure Harvard architecture computer suffers from the disadvantage that mechanisms must be provided to separately load the program to be executed into instruction memory and any data to be operated upon into data memory. Additionally, modern Harvard architecture machines often use a read-only technology for the instruction memory and read/write technology for the data memory. This allows the computer to begin execution of a pre-loaded program as soon as power is applied. The data memory will at this time be in an unknown state, so it is not possible to provide any kind of pre-defined data values to the program.The solution is to provide a hardware pathway and machine language instructions so that the contents of the instruction memory can be read as if they were data. Initial data values can then be copied from the instruction memory into the data memory when the program starts. If the data is not to be modified (for example, if it is a constant value, such as pi, or a text string), it can be accessed by the running program directly from instruction memory without taking up space in data memory (which is often at a premium).
DSP's are mainly based on Harvard architecture to perform task faster with hard wired instructions as compared to Microcontrollers which are mainly available with von neumann architecture (some microcontrollers like PIC is an exception). The DSP can compute the numerical parts of your application faster than the microcontroller can. Because that's what it's designed to do. You might also find that DSPs have more of the "right sort" of integrated peripherals, compared to microcontrollers.
John Von Neumann's: One shared memory for instructions (program) and data with one data bus and one address bus between processor and memory. Instructions and data have to be fetched in sequential order (known as the Von Neumann Bottleneck), limiting the operation bandwidth. Its design is simpler than that of the Harvard architecture. It is mostly used to interface to external memory.explain correctly what is von neumann concept?an automatic programmable computer using a single shared common memory for storing both instructions and data.This is in contrast to Harvard Architecture, which is an automatic programmable computer using two physically separate memories for storing instructions and data.Most modern computers use a mixture of both: the CPU itself is Harvard, getting instructions and data from two physically separate caches; but the system as a whole is von Neumann, loading both caches from a single common shared memory.
differentiate between general and specific reserve?
Differentiate a pilot and a plane!
It's important to differentiate between right and wrong. She could not differentiate between the two identical twins. The new software features were designed to help differentiate their product from competitors. The expert could easily differentiate authentic artwork from fakes.
Differentiate between a simple bridge and transparent bridge
differentiate between physical assets from physical liabilities