The anonymous letter written by a soldier is considered a primary document because it was created firsthand by someone directly involved in the events described, providing valuable insight into the soldier's perspective and experiences. As a primary source, the letter offers a direct and unfiltered view of historical events, making it a valuable resource for understanding the soldier's thoughts and feelings during that time.
our mom told me
context
Primary source: A historical document written by an eyewitness; secondary source: a historical document interpreting the accounts of eyewitnesses
Yes, a letter written to a soldier's wife would be considered a primary source as it directly reflects the experiences and perspectives of the person writing it.
context
Primary source.
Alcoholics Anonymous has written: 'Survey of Alcoholics Anonymous in Great Britain 1991'
A historical document written by an eyewitness .... APEX
A diary written by someone during the time period being studied would be considered a primary source document. It provides a firsthand account of experiences, thoughts, and emotions from that specific time.
There is lots of stuff written by Anonymous. I have found that when even I encounter a work that I don't know who it was written by, it turns out that it was written by Anonymous.
the context of the document's production, including the time in which it was written, the circumstances under which it came into being, and the place in which it was written.
Anonymous has written: 'Tractatus De Discantu/Concerning Discant'