Want this question answered?
No.
The class of 2010 represents all the people who graduated in 2010, whether from elementary school, high school, university, college, or other institution.
I dont Know ask me #floatingjewfrogs
She was attending Keller high school when she appeared in ANTM and then she graduated from the University of Texas majoring in broadcasting. Though I'm not sure whether she graduated or not. She definitely entered Texas Univ, though.
No, it does not matter whether you have graduated.
50 ml is 50/1000 of a litre. Whether of not you use a graduated cylinder (however you choose to spell the word) is irrelevant.
It depends on whether your college has become a university before or after you graduated, whether the name of college is different from the name of the university and if the name change took place less than ten years ago (Example: Maryland's Villa Julie College became StevensonUniversity in 2008). If you want to, for example, list your education on a resume, and the name of the school changed after you graduated, one option is to put down the original name of the school at the time of your graduation and in parentheses, "now known as [new/current name of school]". Another way to do this is to put down the current name of the school and put in parentheses, "formerly known as [previous name of school]".
Yes you have to graduate from there, however you don't have to attend that school for the full amount of years. You can go somewhere else and transfer in senior year and still be qualified as alumni. Good Luck! :)
The boy lifted his hand scrawl his name on the test that was going to determine whether he would get in to Stanford or not.
Depending on whether you then graduated from high school, college or universitiy, you would probably be somewhere between 58 and 65 years old.
http://www.stanford.edu/home/stanford/history/begin.html You may have heard a story that a lady in "faded gingham" (Jane Stanford) and a man dressed in a "homespun threadbare suit" (Leland Stanford) went to visit the president of Harvard, were rebuffed, and as a result, went on to found their own university in Palo Alto. This untrue story is an urban myth, and Stanford's archivist has prepared a response for those desiring more information: For what it is worth, there was a book written by the then Harvard president's son that may have started the twist on actual events. Leland Stanford Junior was just short of his 16th birthday when he died of typhoid fever in Florence, Italy on March 13, 1884. He had not spent a year at Harvard before his death, nor was he "accidentally killed." Following Leland Junior's death, the Stanfords determined to found an institution in his name that would serve the "children of California." Detained on the East Coast following their return from Europe, the Stanfords visited a number of universities and consulted with the presidents of each. The account of their visit with Charles W. Eliot at Harvard is actually recounted by Eliot himself in a letter sent to David Starr Jordan (Stanford's first president) in 1919. At the point the Stanfords met with Eliot, they apparently had not yet decided about whether to establish a university, a technical school or a museum. Eliot recommended a university and told them the endowment should be $5 million. Accepted accounts indicate that Jane and Leland looked at each other and agreed they could manage that amount. The thought of Leland and Jane, by this time quite wealthy, arriving at Harvard in a faded gingham dress and homespun threadbare suit is quite entertaining. And, as a former governor of California and well-known railroad baron, they likely were not knowingly kept waiting for too long outside Eliot's office. The Stanfords also visited Cornell, MIT and Johns Hopkins. The Stanfords established two institutions in Leland Junior's name -- the University and the Museum, which was originally planned for San Francisco, but moved to adjoin the university.
Although I do not know whether he actually graduated, he did attend the London School of Economics.