Pretty much this is by definition impossible; for example, Betrand Russell postulated a teapot orbiting the sun - how would you prove it wasn't there? Another example would be to claim that there was a grain of sand somewhere with your name engraved upon it; to prove that not true, one would have to examine every grain of sand in the world. To resolve this type of problem, philosophers invoke Occam's Razor - explanations should use the fewest number of assumptions.
The participle forms of "prove" are "proved" and "proven."
Neither. A theorem is a proven mathematical statement. This says nothing about how easily it can be proven. e.g. the Pythagorean Theorem is easily proven, but Fermat's Last Theorem is extremely difficult to prove.
There have been many attempts to try and prove it but so far none of these succeeded
9
Positive u can drive negative u cant drive
Because the whole of a theory is that it cannot be proven...
You cannot prove a negative. This is a well known, well established facet of logic. In order to prove that something does not exist you go about trying to prove that they do exist and then report that you have failed. Having failed however isn't proof of non-existence, it is only a demonstration that it cannot be proven at this time.
The participle forms of "prove" are "proved" and "proven."
The word proven is an adjective. It descrbes something that has been proved.
The past participle of "prove" is "proved" in British English and "proven" in American English.
It can be proven, you have to do at least 3 experiments to prove your hypothesis.
I/You/We/They prove. He/She/It proves.
proof
The procedures required for this to be proven
Had proven.
Prove to whom? You can't "prove" a negative.
This is a misnomer. Scientists often and do prove their findings, particularly through repetition of an experiment. Scientists cannot prove a negative (reindeer can't fly), but can only prove such under specific conditions (these reindeer can't fly in March). Theories are not said to be proven until they can fully explain a set of conditions. Even then, parts of a theory can be proven, but the whole remains open to refinement.