A criminal case is harder to prove, as the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt." A civil case only has to be by a "preponderance of the evidence" which is anything over half.
Evidence can prove, or disprove, the case against you.
If the attorney can prove the officer's intent to violate your rights, or a statute, your case is likely to raise concerns: if nothing else. If the attorney cannot prove that the officer knowingly and intentionally violated a statute, you probably do not have a case. That being said, you can never be "positive" of anything in the justice system.
to prove discrimination
They moved on to a new case.
I am sorry but we can't answer because we don't know the case you are asking about.
No. You mean "a case in point" A case in point is an example that helps to prove your argument eg "The weather is unpredictable, last week's hurricanes were a case in point."
Yes, it does.
The defense do not have to prove anything, if the prosecution fail to prove guilt, then the defendant is not guilty (in an ideal world). It may be the case thaat a jury may find guilt when a charge has not really been adequately proved to be true, but in this case the judge must direct them to find "not guilty" through lack of evidence.
Prove or improve being reliable? Same answer in either case. Be reliable when given the chance to prove it. Do what you say you will do each and every time and eventually you will have the reputation of being reliable.
It means the facts prove the case and their is no grey (questionable area).
to try and prove the guiltyness of the defendent with evedence and or witnesses