answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Roman numeral you have included is not a valid number. Generally speaking C is 100 and X = 10 so in the case of the number mentioned, it starts as XC = 90 (ten less than 100). Then comes L, which is 50 so we could get 140... but the right way to write 140 in Roman numberals is CXL not XCL.

Then you add the D, which is 500. This number should definitely come at the front. Then you add V which is 5.

Assuming the number you wanted to represent was 545 you would put: DCXLV not XCLDV.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do you read this roman numerals by number XCLDV?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How do you say roman numerals?

To say roman numerals, all you have to do is say the letter in it. Example- CCIX: You say SEE SEE EYE EX. (CCIX) That's how easy it is!actually, you say it like the number is read I is read as one.


What number for xxix?

36 I added a link to help you understand how to read Roman numerals.


How do read Roman Numerals?

with your eyes.


How do you read 943 in roman numerals?

XCXLIII


What is 178 in roman numerals?

It would read CLXXVIII


What are the roman numerals for the number 1932?

Roman numerals: M=1000, D=500, C=100, L=50, X=10, V=5 and I=1. Symbols are written and read from left to right, from highest to lowest. The arabic number 1932 corresponds to the roman numeral MCMXXXII.


How would 1987 read in roman numeral?

1987 in Roman numerals would be MCMLXXXVII


What is XM Roman Numerals?

It is not a proper Roman Numeral. It could be read to be 1990, or 1010


What are the good things about roman numerals?

there not confusing to read or wright


What is xxxvi?

36 I added a link to help you understand how to read Roman numerals.


Why do roman numerals have a place value system?

So as to read out the numerals in a logical descending order as for example MDCLXVI = 1666


Why do we not use Roman Numerals a lot these days.Thank you Regards, Aarav Mishra?

It's somewhat tautological, but one reason we don't use them is because nobody uses them. Not everyone can read them, so using them limits the number of people who can read what you wrote, and that generally defeats the purpose of writing something. The second is that they're inefficient compared to Arabic numerals. Compare a simple number like 1,234. The Roman Numeral equivalent is MCCXXXIV. Look at how many more characters that is than the Arabic numerals, and that's only a thousand. Imagine how many Roman Numerals you'd need to write a number in the billions. The third is that Arabic numerals are built with math in mind. When you write math in Arabic numerals the equivalent values are in the same places, but with the Roman system they can be all over the place. For example, 9-7 in Roman numerals would be IX - VII. It's very unintuitive to read, and getting from the numbers that you start with to the ones that you'll end up with will mean converting them to different formats.