0
How do you seek feedback on whether the communication achieved its purpose?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the advantages of knowing the purpose of communication?
By knowing the purpose of communication you know how to respond, to whether it is designed to start a debate, send a message to people or just a general information briefing and know how to interpret the information.
Is communication a circular process?
Whether or not communication is a circular process depends on which model of communication best fits the particular communicative act you are discussing. One of the earliest communication models is the Shannon-Weaver model, which is linear; a message is sent through a channel to a recipient, who does not provide any feedback. Obviously, this means that the communication is not circular. An example of this would be most televised broadcasts, like the president's speeches, as the viewer has few opportunities to provide feedback. Later models of communication, however, added a mechanism for recipient feedback. In what is known as the transactional or circular model of communication, the receiver and recipient both send and receive messages, leading to both parties being renamed sender-receivers. This is a circular model of communication. An example of this is most interpersonal, face-to-face communication. You receive feedback from your conversation partner through their body language and verbal responses and so adjust your messages to fit that; your partner does the same. Today, most communication tends to be seen as transactional, meaning that it is circular.
4 As a sender how do you obtain feedback from your receiver?
The best way to get feedback is to ask. You can ask whether the receiver has any questions about your message in order to get feedback.
What are similarities between linear model of communication and transactional model of communication?
Well, both the linear model and the transactional model of communication have some similarities. Firstly, they both involve the exchange of information between a sender and a receiver. In both models, there is a sender who initiates the communication and a receiver who receives the message. Secondly, both models involve the use of a channel for communication. Whether it's through spoken words, written messages, or any other form of communication, there is a channel through which the message is transmitted. Another similarity is that both models recognize the importance of feedback. In the linear model, feedback is usually limited to a response or reaction from the receiver. In the transactional model, feedback is seen as an integral part of the communication process, with both the sender and receiver constantly exchanging roles and providing feedback to each other. Lastly, both models acknowledge that communication can be influenced by noise or barriers. These barriers can be physical, psychological, or environmental and can affect the effectiveness of the communication process. So, while there may be differences between the linear model and the transactional model of communication, they also share some commonalities in terms of the basic components and factors that affect communication.
What is volume in communication?
Volume in communication is the loudness of how you are speaking to a person whether it be really silent so the person cannot hear you, or whether it is to loud almost so that you are shouting.
Why is feedback importance in communication?
Without feedback, the person who speaks or otherwise sends a message can never know whether or not that message is actually understood.
What are the advantages of knowing the purpose of communication?
By knowing the purpose of communication you know how to respond, to whether it is designed to start a debate, send a message to people or just a general information briefing and know how to interpret the information.
Describe the purpose of communication in business?
To promulgate the organisation's interest whether those are profit or non profit making interests.
Is communication a circular process?
Whether or not communication is a circular process depends on which model of communication best fits the particular communicative act you are discussing. One of the earliest communication models is the Shannon-Weaver model, which is linear; a message is sent through a channel to a recipient, who does not provide any feedback. Obviously, this means that the communication is not circular. An example of this would be most televised broadcasts, like the president's speeches, as the viewer has few opportunities to provide feedback. Later models of communication, however, added a mechanism for recipient feedback. In what is known as the transactional or circular model of communication, the receiver and recipient both send and receive messages, leading to both parties being renamed sender-receivers. This is a circular model of communication. An example of this is most interpersonal, face-to-face communication. You receive feedback from your conversation partner through their body language and verbal responses and so adjust your messages to fit that; your partner does the same. Today, most communication tends to be seen as transactional, meaning that it is circular.
What is the SDN forum and what is it used for?
An SDN forum is a forum that allows doctors and students to work together in an open space whether it is work related or for the purpose of feedback from their own peers.
4 As a sender how do you obtain feedback from your receiver?
The best way to get feedback is to ask. You can ask whether the receiver has any questions about your message in order to get feedback.
What is the advantage of spoken communication?
Oral communication allows for immediate feedback such as the opportunity to ask questions when the meaning is not entirely clear. - The sender is able to check and see whether if the instruction is clear or has created confusion. - Spoken instructions are flexible and easily adaptable to many diverse situations.
When sending messages what factors need to be taken into consideration to ensure that information will be received and understood and what general skills can be taught to ensure that information recie?
Communication, whether oral or written, is all about understanding. Our aim should be to communicate a message successfully so that it is received as we intended it to be received, without any misunderstanding. Effective communication can be achieved by being aware of the barriers which exist, and by considering carefully the following vital factors: - What is the objective of the communication? - Is it intended to give information, to persuade, to request, to inform? - Who will receive the communication? - What is the relationship between sender and recipient? - What is the recipient's background knowledge and experience? - Under what circumstances is the communication taking place? - Why is the communication happening? Is it urgent, serious, dangerous, emotive, informative? - How will the recipient react to the communication? - How will the message affect the recipient? Is it important? - Will the recipient be offended or angered? Will it achieve the desired aims? Bearing in mind the above factors, we have a checklist for effective communication: 1. Think clearly. Think before you speak or write. 2. Listen intelligently. Remember that communication is a two-way process. Listening is just as important as speaking. Similarly, try reading your written message as if you were the recipient, and consider if it will be effective. 3. Select appropriate media. Consider carefully the method to be used for communicating your message. It should be appropriate to the desired objective. 4. Time your communication appropriately. Consider when the communication should take place, and how long it SHOUD BE. 5. Use appropriate language. Use words which are relevant to the topic and which will be understood by the recipient. 6. Obtain feedback. Obtain feedback to ensure that the communication was effective. Feedback When a message has been communicated, the sender should find out if it has been understood by obtaining feedback. Sometimes feedback is obtained which indicates that understanding has not been achieved. In such cases you should ask yourself why, rather than blame the recipient. Perhaps your expressions or your language led to confusion or misunderstanding. Perhaps your timing was poor. Perhaps your message was too long so that the main points were lost. Perhaps your tone or manner was inappropriate Communication, whether oral or written, is all about understanding. Our aim should be to communicate a message successfully so that it is received as we intended it to be received, without any misunderstanding. Effective communication can be achieved by being aware of the barriers which exist, and by considering carefully the following vital factors: - What is the objective of the communication? - Is it intended to give information, to persuade, to request, to inform? - Who will receive the communication? - What is the relationship between sender and recipient? - What is the recipient's background knowledge and experience? - Under what circumstances is the communication taking place? - Why is the communication happening? Is it urgent, serious, dangerous, emotive, informative? - How will the recipient react to the communication? - How will the message affect the recipient? Is it important? - Will the recipient be offended or angered? Will it achieve the desired aims? Bearing in mind the above factors, we have a checklist for effective communication: 1. Think clearly. Think before you speak or write. 2. Listen intelligently. Remember that communication is a two-way process. Listening is just as important as speaking. Similarly, try reading your written message as if you were the recipient, and consider if it will be effective. 3. Select appropriate media. Consider carefully the method to be used for communicating your message. It should be appropriate to the desired objective. 4. Time your communication appropriately. Consider when the communication should take place, and how long it SHOUD BE. 5. Use appropriate language. Use words which are relevant to the topic and which will be understood by the recipient. 6. Obtain feedback. Obtain feedback to ensure that the communication was effective. Feedback When a message has been communicated, the sender should find out if it has been understood by obtaining feedback. Sometimes feedback is obtained which indicates that understanding has not been achieved. In such cases you should ask yourself why, rather than blame the recipient. Perhaps your expressions or your language led to confusion or misunderstanding. Perhaps your timing was poor. Perhaps your message was too long so that the main points were lost. Perhaps your tone or manner was inappropriate
What is employer feedback?
Feedback describes how much and what type of information about job performance is received by the employee. Without feedback, employees have no way of knowing whether they are doing things correctly or incorrectly.
What are similarities between linear model of communication and transactional model of communication?
Well, both the linear model and the transactional model of communication have some similarities. Firstly, they both involve the exchange of information between a sender and a receiver. In both models, there is a sender who initiates the communication and a receiver who receives the message. Secondly, both models involve the use of a channel for communication. Whether it's through spoken words, written messages, or any other form of communication, there is a channel through which the message is transmitted. Another similarity is that both models recognize the importance of feedback. In the linear model, feedback is usually limited to a response or reaction from the receiver. In the transactional model, feedback is seen as an integral part of the communication process, with both the sender and receiver constantly exchanging roles and providing feedback to each other. Lastly, both models acknowledge that communication can be influenced by noise or barriers. These barriers can be physical, psychological, or environmental and can affect the effectiveness of the communication process. So, while there may be differences between the linear model and the transactional model of communication, they also share some commonalities in terms of the basic components and factors that affect communication.
What is the purpose of a review of a written work?
The purpose of a review of a written work is to provide feedback and critique on various aspects such as plot, characters, writing style, and overall impact. Reviews help readers decide whether to engage with the work and also offer insights to the author for potential improvements.
Is it correct to say feedbacks?
No, it is not correct to say "feedbacks." The correct word is "feedback" whether you are referring to a single piece of feedback or multiple points of feedback.
