You don't, a court (and its officers; judge, bailiff, etc) are immune from criminal or civil penalties for any action it takes: even if that action is clearly against established law. And, yes that is contrary to congressional intent; 42 USC 1983 & 18 USC 241,242 - but you would be asking the court to convict itself. When is the last time you saw a criminal turn themselves in for committing a crime; much less one that no one knew about? The last thing a court would do is subject itself to the authority of the people (it is supposed to serve).
To uphold and sustain the law of the land.
it wasnt a civil war.
the civil rights movement.
No. That would be a civil matter that would be heard in a civil lawsuit.No. That would be a civil matter that would be heard in a civil lawsuit.No. That would be a civil matter that would be heard in a civil lawsuit.No. That would be a civil matter that would be heard in a civil lawsuit.
Typically, a judge in family court does not have the authority to reverse a ruling made in civil court. Family court has its own jurisdiction over specific family-related matters such as divorce, child custody, and support. If a ruling has been made in civil court, it would generally have to be appealed to a higher court rather than being reversed by a judge in family court.
It would be a civil matter.
She suffered during the Civil War with all of the death that was going on.
Trespassing is a crime, which means it is a criminal matter. It is not a civil matter.
This is a civil matter.
The ruling was that segregation in public places had to come to an end. Answer 2: The ruling stated that segregation in education facilities was unconstitutional. Integration and the Civil Rights Movement were results of the ruling.
Corruption civil matter
No. Outstanding debt is a civil matter, not criminal. You can not be arrested for a civil matter.