I'd need a whole essay to really delve into this, but here is the brunt of it: Historical perspectives have played a huge role in the lives of homosexual individuals. In ancient times it was fairly common and so it happened freely. In the sexually stifling Victorian times, while straight sex was unsightly, gay sex was unheard of. However, though it affected the visibility of the homosexual individuals, it by no means made them disappear. Scientific perspectives could easily be argued to be little more than modern-day historical perspectives. The scientific perspective is the way that we (logical individuals) currently try to view homosexuality. As the culture as a whole tries to understand homosexuality (which seems to have been around for eons) homosexuals try to help culture understand and, in turn, understand themselves. Historical and scientific perspectives on homosexuality force homosexuals to mirror trends rampant in a culture at any givent time.
indepenence
The removal of homosexuality from the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) in 1973 was due to growing scientific evidence and understanding that homosexuality is not a mental disorder but rather a normal variation of human sexuality. The decision was also influenced by advocacy efforts and protests from the LGBTQ+ community.
Yes it was a scientific as well as a historical discovery.
Homosexuality is a choice in exactly the same way that being 6 feet tall is a choice.
There does not seem to be a clear-cut term for genetic homosexuality - in fact, the best description of it is potentially the one used in the wording of the question. A related term which describes identity based on biological characteristics is 'sexual identity'.
Idk im looking for new scientific discoveries for medicines :( cant find any.
It is the Enlightenment Age
TRue
historical and current scientific knowledge.
i like pizza
comparative genomics
lolwut?