"Delta" - the uppercase Greek letter delta, which looks like a triangle - is often used in the sense of "difference". You are simply supposed to calculate the difference between two different values of "v" (where "v" might stand for the velocity).
I think the answer to your question is acceleration.acceleration = change in velocity/ timea = deltav / tdelta is a triangle shaped character which means change in
Oceanographers work on the ocean and some work in land and some work in laboratories.
This is the mathematical form of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle: deltaX * deltaV >= h/m Where X is position and V is velocity. This reads: "The Uncertainty of Position multiplied by The Uncertainty of Velocity is always greater than or equal to Plank's constant over mass". IE - the more you know position, the less you know velocity. However, in macroscopic systems like 'daily life', "mass" tends to be very big indeed. And so the right hand side of the equation becoms tiny. Therefore the left hand side must become tiny too. So the uncertainty becomes miniscule for objects with big mass, and so we don't notice it.
Work is energy lost from a contained system.
No, not all oceanographers work in a lab, some may work at sea. There are various places where an oceanographer can work.
I think the answer to your question is acceleration.acceleration = change in velocity/ timea = deltav / tdelta is a triangle shaped character which means change in
none. Siemens's APACS is an obsolete system and over time will be increasing difficult to maintain resulting in a higher total cost of ownership.
Delta (Greek capital D...looks like an isoceles triangle) means the change in....whatever. Delta T is (T2-T1) Delta V is (V2-V1), etc. this would be the answer to your question if you're in school... if you're an engineer the answer would be: Deltav is a DCS[Distributed Control System offered by Emerson Inc...] it is used in the automation industry the latest version is the deltav 10.3 for further information visit: http://www.easydeltav.com/
During a car crash, the forearms of a passenger are slammed against the dashboard. Each arm comes to rest from an initial speed of 80 km/h in 5 ms. If the arm has an effective mass of 3 kg and bone material can withstand a maximum compression stress of 16 x 107 Pa, will the arms withstand the crash? (cross-section of calcified area of the two forearm bones, ulna and radius, is approximately 2.4 cm2 ) F = m (deltav/ deltat) Deltav = 80 km/h × [1000 (m/km) / 3,600 (s/hr)] = 22.2 m/s Delta t = 5 ms = 5 × 10-3 s Delta F = 3 kg × [22.2 (m/s) / 5 × 10^-3 s] = 1.33 × 10^4 N
Heat is required to make the reaction occur.
The node rule states that i=nAuE where i is electron current, n is electron density, A is cross-sectional area of wire used, u is electron mobility, and E is Electric field inside the wire. The Loop Rule also states the potential difference around a closes circuit must be zero. That is deltaV=0 and therefore a circuit with one battery(2 volts) and one light bulb( with an electric field and a certain length filament) will equal this 2V-EL=0 or -2V+EL=0
I've spent a few years involved in the specification and requisitioning of a large (10 000+ I/O) Honeywell DCS, and before that I spent 2 years doing the same for a large yokogawa DCS. When it came to both the hardware performance/capability and the quality of engineering, there is no comparison, Yokogawa won by a long way. I can't comment on price. A few gripes I've had with Honeywell: 1) Inter-plant signals - signals had to be hardwired between controllers if they are to be passed from one community/domain to another to maintain a scan rate of 1 second. Sort of takes word 'distributed' out of DCS. 2) Graphics are very limited in the number of tags/variables and many of them had to be split up - much to the operators dismay. 3) Sheer volume of unnecessary documentation - for example, they submitted a 50 page document for review describing the typical software for a differential pressure indication. The industry has changed a lot of the past few years especially with increased pressure for good resources so I'm sure all DCS vendors are subjected to the same engineering quality problems. Therefore will not go into the engineering issues we had. Hope that helps. ===== I am not fully agree with the above explaination. You may be a Yokogawa supporter, but don't just give false information to other. 1) Inter plant connectivity can be achieved through DSA (Distributed Server Architecture) configuration. 2) Graphics are built for man-machine interface only. Off course, if you want the whole plant to be in one graphic page then that's create performance issue. If you built and arrange your graphic pages properly, there should not be any issue raised. 3) Nobody will agree that 50pages are submitted for a pressure loop description. I have seen SDM (Software Design Manual) from Honeywell used for a particular project. It was nice and explanatory. regrds --------------------------- The one u said on the new Honeywell DCS ... EPKS .... I am using Honeywell for a long time.... but as a customer we are looking at the work quality and products ..... I am not sure about Yokogawa but I believe it does have similar problem like Honeywell... Products problem: 1. Too many bugs 2. No experties in Malaysia for new products 3. SUpport team lack of compentency 4. Product reliability and availability weak... and all of this contribute more cost to customer where they had to pay them just to fixing things that they also not really expert... this the reason why user keep asking and concern on the cost for them to repair. anyway .. both system has their own weakness... so the only ways is how we ensure they deliver the good quality one..
They got their education by secretly learning it if their master didn't allowed because it was illegal. Sometimes, their masters tought the slave even though it was against the law. By secretly learning it, they could learn it off another slave or steal a book and educate themselves.
they just work they just work,work,work
the work a machine does is the work outputwhat it takes to do the work is the work inputSources;The_work_that_the_simple_machine_does_is_called_the_work
the work a machine does is the work output what it takes to do the work is the work input
Work , Work , Work , Work , Work , Work ! They do what You lazy Americans don't . Mexicans work hard . They do it all !