The Romans had no numeral for zero as they did not need one in their system. However during the middle ages monks who still wrote in latin and used Roman numerals began to use the symbol N (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing) to represent zero.
There is not a Roman Numeral for 0.
It is: 500 = D as a Roman numeral
CCLXMMMCDXXIV is the Roman Numeral of 263424.
As a Roman numeral 326 is CCCXXVI
The Roman numeral for 4 is written as IV.
The Roman numeral for 295 is CCXCV.
1 = I as a Roman numeral
It is: 38 = XXXVIII as a Roman numeral
Roman Numeral MMDLXII
The roman numerals don't have a way to write 0, negative numbers, or fractions.
1566 coverted into a Roman numeral is MDLXVI
No, the number 0 does not have a corresponding Roman numeral. Roman numerals were developed by the ancient Romans and do not include a representation for the concept of zero.