0
How does Caral Schurz counter the argument that annexation of the Philippines was necessary to make the nation a commercial market for the US?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
He did not agree with the notion that in order for a country to be profitable, it had to be owned. He also thought that etc.hope this is the answer you are looking for dont know if its right but it should this is what i sead on this note.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoTaking a general view of the Philippines as a commercial market for us, I need not again argue against the barbarous notion that in order to have a profitable trade with a country we must own it. If that were true, we should never have had any foreign commerce at all.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the main argument made in the declaration of independence?
Argue that a new government was necessary to protect the rights of the people.
What was one argument against nineteenth century American Imperialism?
Anti-imperialists thought: -cheap foreign labor would become a danger to american workers -american rule of places such as the philippines contradicted the principles on which the u.s. was founded -they opposed the large standing army that would be necessary to control the small countries sources-my textbook
Is this True or false Alexander Hamilton's argument for a national bank is an example of strict construction of the constitution?
False. This was an example of loose construction and one of the first major uses of the "necessary and proper" or "Elastic Clause" of the Constitution.
What is Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 are they convincing?
Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 that were really convincing was his argument in favour of parliamentary reform. Thank you very much, but what exactly is his argument. I'm reading over the Bill and just cannot understand what his argument actually is.
What is the anti-imperialist argument in rome?
If you are referring to ancient Rome, there was not an anti-imperialist argument.
What was the major argument of annexation of Texas?
northerners opposed because they said the annexation would bring more power to the south and spread slavery which they didnt want.
Example of an argument with a premise and conclusion?
Many People in her Philippines are sick to A(H1N1) flue virus.
What is an argument in favor of affirmation action?
legislation is necessary to allow minorities to overcome generations of discrimination
Is it true that a necessary feature of an argument is that it involves a moral topic?
Moral topics needn't be a necessary or essential feature of an argument. Material topics are most often very good to be argued about. Only that meaningful arguments involve some topic, moral or material.
Why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted.?
The purpose of the critique is to insure that the scientific argument has been properly researched and investigated and no possible alternate arguments have been ignored.
Why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted?
The purpose of the critique is to insure that the scientific argument has been properly researched and investigated and no possible alternate arguments have been ignored.
How do you have judge rule in your favor?
By having the most convincing argument backed up by the facts necessary to prove your innocence.
Involvement in political life was necessary according to Aristotle?
Involvement in political life was necessary according to Aristotle. This was based on the argument that politics will influence your life either directly or indirectly.
What is the main argument made in the declaration of independence?
Argue that a new government was necessary to protect the rights of the people.
Is cutting off the female virginity skin equivalent to cutting off the male foreskin?
There is an argument that male circumcision is not a necessary procedure, that it has no medical necessity and is a barbaric tradition. There remains argument on the subject because there is at least anecdotal evidence to support the medical side of it.There is no argument against the fact that female genital mutilation is barbaric. It is not necessary, has no medical purpose, and serves only to support a misogynistic, male dominated culture.
What is the insistence that a line must be drawn at some point in an argument when in fact it is not necessary for such a precise line to be drawn at all?
line-drawing
Why do you say check please?
It's a saying basically used when one has concluded an argument, signaling that they are done and no further arguing is necessary.
