if a diode is in forward biased the diode acts as switch is on and when we apply the diode in reverse biased then it work as the switch as off.
Biased listening occurs when an individual listens to a superficial level and typically misinterpret the message.
A nonconducting diode is biased in the reversed direction (reverse polarization).
Zero current flow when reverse biased, zero voltage drop when forward biased.
i think in order to population inversion in depletion region. also the laser diodes must be degenerated.
yes the coin is biased because it turned to heads 36 times.
The probability of heads is 0.6 and that of tails is 0.4. Since the probabilities are not 0.5, it is a biased coin. That is the answer!
If the coin is not biased, the answer is 0.375
Probability of getting a head or tail is not equal
0.63 = 0.216
I may be biased, but I vote for ME. Any coin dealer who is a member of PNG or ANA has pledged to deal honestly and if complaints are filed against him he will be disciplined or lose his membership.
Because when reverse biased it behaves like any other rectifier/diode.
Possibly not - the sample of 60 times is very small.
A biased probability is one where not every outcome has the same chance of occurring. A biased coin is one where one side, the "heads" or "tails" has a greater probability than the other of showing. A coin which has a centre of gravity closer to the tails side than the heads side would be biased in that heads is more likely to show than tails. The size of coin can have an effect on the probability of heads and tails - during the Royal Institute Christmas lectures in the 1990s demonstrating probability a large version of the pound coin was made to be able to allow the audience to see it being tossed - on the broadcast (and tape) version it landed and stayed on its edge! showing the probability of heads = tails ≠ ½; the probability of heads = probability of tails, but they are actually slightly less than ½ as the coin could land on its edge and stay there - with a standard size coin, if it lands on its edge it takes very little for the centre of gravity to shift outside the base of the edge and for the coin to fall over, but with a very large similar coin (ie one scaled up [proportionally] in lengths) it can take quite a bit before the centre of gravity goes outside the base if it lands on its edge which forces it to fall over (plus there will be a "significant" rise in the centre of gravity to do so, thus favouring stability on an edge which does not exist in the standard, small, sized version of the coin).
I'm guessing this is a probability question. A die (or coin, or spinner, or roulette wheel, or other method of choosing something randomly) is fair if each possibility (1,2,3,4,5,6) has an equal chance of coming up. Anything that isn't fair is biased. For example a die that has been weighted to make 6s come up is biased.
28 times out of 50 as a percent is achieved thus (28/50)*100 = 56% (The coin would appear to be biased by the way).
you can not people can be biased and not biased