0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are historians bias when it comes to determining a president's greatness?
Historians would attempt to be unbiased and look objectively at the president's record. Since they are human like the rest of us, it would be almost impossible for them not to allow their biases to influence their determinations from time to time, although professional historians would strive to separate personal biases from objective determinations.
Why is common sense important to the cause of independence?
it was important because this meant no one can rule a country
Why some historians are in favor of James mill classification of history?
James mill in 1817 had classified the book into three partswhich is1 part is Hindu2 part is MuslimAnd the third part is British Rule
How is bias a problem in learning about history?
it can be bias because when learning history some people have diffrent opinions and answers to questions can be different.
Why is it important as historians to recognize the difference between facts and opinions?
It is important as historians to recognise the difference because opinions are not necessarily true, or what happened. You can have 2 or more opinions that go against eachother, but there's only one fact. Opinions also show more of the feeling of the time (whether people liked or disliked certain events), rather than what actually happened. Some effects that are fact, were sparked off by opinions, they are interlinked, but definitely different.
Historians bias rule is a guideline that recognizes that all sources?
biased
Why bias is important to historians?
It helps historians to remember to check other sources for facts.
How is bias usful to historians?
Bias can be useful to historians by allowing them to learn about people's opinions and beliefs.
The time and place rule determines that the a source and its creator were to an event in the past the more valuable the source will be?
Historians use the time and place rule because the source is deemed to be more reliable. The other rule historians use is the bias rule that says everyone will be biased in some way when recounting events.
Is bias useful to historians?
yes
What is the bias rule?
biased :) <3 Apex Answered by the Jarizzle :)
Why should historians look for bias in a source?
Historians would be wise to look for bias in a source because bias can influence the way the writer relayed the information. Sources free from bias are to be the most trusted.
Why do historians need to be worried about reports with bias in them?
Historians need to be concerned about reports with bias because bias can distort the accuracy and objectivity of historical information. It can lead to incomplete or misleading interpretations of events, which can impact the overall understanding of the past. Historians strive to present a balanced and unbiased view of history to ensure the integrity of their research and analysis.
What are two rules historians use to determine the quality of a primary source?
Historians use the time and place rule to determine how close to the event was the person describing the event and how much time was between the event and when the event was described. In addition, they use the bias rule. Documents must be compared with relatedsources and pieces of evidence.
What do Historians and researchers primarily base their research on?
bias or primary
Where should Historians be aware of bias?
Everywhere! All historians are people, most if not all people are biased, therefore, most history is biased. Therefore, bias is everywhere and needs to be considered.
Why do historians need to be careful about bias?
Historians Have To Be Careful Of Bias Because, If They Are Writting A Report About Something That Has Happened That Is Part Of History, They Might Use Bias Because They Want The Story To Be Remembered Or Famous In Some Way. But They Don't Want To Use Too Much Bias Because It May Not Be True !
