0
In general, yes. The basic process of "evolution", in which each generation of creatures either survive or do not, in response to environmental factors, is pretty much undisputed. The creatures that survive more often are likely to prosper and thrive; the ones that survive LESS often (no process is absolute) will gradually become extinct.
So in the geological record, we see evidence of animals and plants that are similar to the ones we know today, some that are somewhat different, and many that are WILDLY different than any we know of today. So in my front yard, I have a ginko tree which is apparently no different from the ones that apatosaurus might have eaten 100 million years ago, while there have been no dinosaurs around for about 65 million years. The shellfish in the market of Catania, Sicily, are essentially the same as the fossil shellfish that have been excavated from the million-year-old lava flows around Mt. Etna.
We cannot know for certain what combinations of factors might have encouraged some species to thrive while others became extinct, but the basic process of evolutionary change is essentially undisputed.
Certainly, Darwin's theories were not 100% accurate - but scientific theories never are. They are always revised as we learn new facts and are able to better interpret old facts into a coherent whole.
What else can I help you with?
Is it true that similarities between seemingly unrelated organisms can be explained by Darwins theory that organisms come from common ancestors?
True
Who was Galileos theory that the earth moves around the sun supported by?
It was Copernicus's theory and Galileo had very little evidence for it at the time of his quarrel with the Vatican, as he discovered when they put him on trial and asked for the evidence.
The discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation and primordial helium gas was scientific evidence supporting what theory?
The 'big bang' theory.
What does the word negative effects mean?
When referring to media, negative effects is the belief that the media can affect behavior in a negative way. This is also called the theory of "strong media effects," the theory that there is a strong like between, let's say, watching violent TV shows and then going out and acting in a violent way. It should be noted that there is no credible evidence to support this theory, but it is widely believed in some circles.
How realistic was the ice bridge theory?
The ice bridge theory, which suggests that a land or ice connection existed between regions like Siberia and North America during periods of glaciation, is considered plausible but has limitations. Geological and paleoclimatic evidence supports the idea that lower sea levels during ice ages could have allowed for such connections, facilitating human and animal migration. However, the specifics of how and when these ice bridges formed are still debated among scientists, and the theory does not account for all migration patterns observed in the archaeological record. Overall, while the theory holds some merit, it is part of a more complex picture of ancient migration.
Darwins theory of evolution views at the time of his work and social forces that led to support for the theory?
There is no proven theory of evolution only the physical evidence of what Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
What are 4 pieces of evidence4 alferd wegner used to support this theory?
Four pieces of evidence used by Alfred Wegener to support his theory of continental drift were the fit of the continents, matching geological formations across continents, similar fossil distributions, and glacial evidence in tropical regions.
What were the 3 types of evidence the Alfred Wegener used to support his theory of Continental Drift?
Alfred Wegener used fossil evidence, geological evidence, and paleoclimatic evidence to support his theory of Continental Drift. Fossils of the same species found on different continents, similar rock formations and mountain ranges across continents, and matching ancient climate patterns were key pieces of evidence that he presented.
How do you make a hypotheses?
A hypothesis is a statement of theory. Something that is unproven. You gather evidence to support that theory. Gather enough evidence to support and a theory becomes accepted as fact.
What evidence did Wegeners have to support his theory?
Fossils support his hypothesis.
Where did wegener look for proof that would support his theory of continental drift?
Alfred Wegener looked for several lines of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of the continents like puzzle pieces, matching geological formations across continents, similarities in fossils and plants, and evidence from paleoclimate data such as glacial deposits.
What evidence did Alfred wegener use to support his theory of the breakup of Pangaea?
Alfred Wegener used evidence such as the apparent fit of the continents, similarities in rock formations and mountain ranges across continents, and the distribution of fossils of identical species in continents that are now separated by vast oceans to support his theory of the breakup of Pangaea. He also cited geological and paleontological evidence from different continents that suggested they were once connected.
How does scientific evidence support the theory of geologic evolution?
I am a geologist and I know of no theory of "geologic evolution". "Evolution" as defined by Darwin describes the origin of species based on the survival of the fittest. This certainly can not be applied to geological processes, although life is integral to geology.
What does theory have to be support by?
Many lines of converging evidence.
Does fossil evidence support wegner's theory?
yes
What evidence of land feautures did Alfred wegener use?
Alfred Wegener used various pieces of evidence to support his theory of continental drift, including the fit of the continents, rock and fossil similarities across continents, glacial evidence, and similar geological features on different continents.
Which if these is not a kind of evidence used to support evolutionary theory?
Personal beliefs and opinions are not a kind of evidence used to support evolutionary theory. Scientific evidence such as fossil records, DNA analysis, and observational data are the main sources of evidence.
