The so-called red shift, a Doppler effect, tells scientist the speed and direction in which a star is moving. By looking at the red shift of a large number of stars, they can establish that they are moving away from us, but every star is moving away from each other. So we can't tell exactly where the big bang ocurred. As many points in a fabric that deviate from one another when expanded.
First, they said that the Universe was moving away from Earth. Mathematicians, however, did not like that. Why should Earth have such a preferential position in the Universe? So the expanding Universe was "discovered." But with the red shift due to a gravity hole, the Universe need not be expanding at all. It's back to square one.
The Big Bang Model!
Hubble's red shift observation.
No, it's the other way round. The Big Bang is responsible for the redshift.
Because if everything we can see is moving away from us, and the further away the faster it's going, if you extrapolate back in time you realize that at some point everything must have been very close together. That's more or less the core of the Big Bang theory. answer2: The Big bang is a bust if there is no expansion , motion! Red shift is interpreted as the motion, thus the Big Bang is possible. However, the red shift is misinterpreted. Hubble himself, did not accept the red shift as recession, rather Hubble called the red shift, "a hitherto unrecognized principle of Nature". The red shift is the indicator of the centrifugal force, associated with the "Dark Energy", the vector energy Ev=mcV. Properly interpreted, the red shift indicates no Expansion, no Big Bang.
Red shift caused by the galaxies moving apart.
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
All modern models based on science that are worth their salt would be. The only major theory I know about the origin of the universe is the Big Bang Theory, which is supported by Red Shift observations. Galaxies we can observe are all moving away (we know this due to Red Shift) from a central point, believed to be the epicenter of the Big Bang.
that stars are moving away from us, as if flung out from an explosion, helping support the big bang theorey and showing us that the universe is expanding
massive energy created matterTo get to the theory ... the red shift (and Hubble).If you're referring to how the big bang began, science has no answer.
Other evidence supporting the Big Bang theory includes the cosmic microwave background radiation, the abundance of light elements in the universe, and the large-scale structure and distribution of galaxies in the universe. Additionally, observations of the universe's expansion and the Hubble law provide further support for the Big Bang theory.
Edwin Hubble showed that the red-shift of distant galaxies was as predicted by Georges LeMaitre's hypothesis, which was later named the Big Bang.
The redshift of galaxies is evidence for the Big Bang theory because it shows that the universe is expanding. When light from distant galaxies is redshifted, it means that those galaxies are moving away from us, indicating that the universe is getting larger and supporting the idea that everything originated from a single point in a massive explosion.