Want this question answered?
99.99% (he gets the blame, at the time he wanted it).
because Winston Churchill (British PM of that time) offered to give Hitler certain benefits which were confiscated as a result of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles (which was put in place after WW1 and blamed Germany for causing it) to prevent a second war. The policy was unsuccessful
False(OW)
Well firstly two World Wars have taken place so far, World War I and World War II. World War I was from 1914 through to 1919. World War II lasted from 1939 to 1945.
Failure of AppeasementAppeasement means giving in to someone provided their demands are seen as reasonable. During the 1930s, many politicians in both Britain and France came to see that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles had placed restrictions on Germany that were unfair. Hitler's actions were seen as understandable and justifiable.When Germany began re-arming in 1934, many politicians felt that Germany had a right to re-arm in order to protect herself. It was also argued that a stronger Germany would prevent the spread of Communism to the west.In 1936, Hitler argued that because France had signed a new treaty with Russia, Germany was under threat from both countries and it was essential to German security that troops were stationed in the Rhineland. France was not strong enough to fight Germany without British help and Britain was not prepared to go to war at this point. Furthermore, many believed that since the Rhineland was a part of Germany it was reasonable that German troops should be stationed there.In May 1937, Neville Chamberlain became Prime Minister of Britain. He believed that the Treaty of Versailles had treated Germany badly and that there were a number of issues associated with the Treaty that needed to be put right. He felt that giving in to Hitler's demands would prevent another war.This policy, adopted by Chamberlain's government became known as the policy of Appeasement. The most notable example of appeasement was the Munich Agreement of September 1938.The Munich Agreement, signed by the leaders of Germany, Britain, France and Italy, agreed that the Sudetenland would be returned to Germany and that no further territorial claims would be made by Germany. The Czech government was not invited to the conference and protested about the loss of the Sudetenland. They felt that they had been betrayed by both Britain and France with whom alliances had been made. However, the Munich Agreement was generally viewed as a triumph and an excellent example of securing peace through negotiation rather than war.When Hitler invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939, he broke the terms of the Munich Agreement. Although it was realised that the policy of appeasement had failed, Chamberlain was still not prepared to take the country to war over "..a quarrel in a far-away country between people of whom we know nothing." Instead, he made a guarantee to come to Poland's aid if Hitler invaded Poland.
99.99% (he gets the blame, at the time he wanted it).
because Winston Churchill (British PM of that time) offered to give Hitler certain benefits which were confiscated as a result of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles (which was put in place after WW1 and blamed Germany for causing it) to prevent a second war. The policy was unsuccessful
Hitler's appeasement was a policy of providing concessions to Nazi Germany and its leader Adolf Hitler by European powers Britain and France mainly. The appeasement policy had many reasons. The British army was not strong enough to challenge German military which had grown tremendously during Hitler's time. A general consensus was that Treaty of Versailles was unfair and global powers were willing to make up to Germany. British leadership believed that Hitler provided a defense against Soviet communism.
in 1941, the mood of the country, as far as foreign policy is concerened, was that of a noninterventionalist.
1939 - 1944 in Europe; to 1945 in the Far East.
Yes, if you are the owner of the policy you can make any changes you wish as far as beneficiary or ownership.
This public policy has been in place for three generations, as far as I know.
the far east
Hitler was 100 percent responsible
Because it produced anger in Germany so they wanted revenge on the aliles
False
If you are referring to the appeasement of Hitler, it could be considered a mistake. However, neither the French and especially the British would not have gone to war over the Sudentland, so Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain had no choice. A war would not have been supported. Either way, Hitler would have taken the Sudentland, war or no war.