answersLogoWhite

0

How is a source valid?

Updated: 9/21/2023
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Best Answer

A source is considered valid if it has these qualities:

1. It is not any type of forum

2. Answers cannot be modified by the public

3. It is not a personal website

A lot of people look at Wikipedia, YahooAnswers, and even this site as invalid sources.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How is a source valid?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is 0.0.0.0 valid ip address.give reason for your answer?

It is valid but it is reserved as a source address only by RFC1700 standard.


Is wikianswers a valid source?

That depends on who answers the question and how well they support their answer.


Is Emptyjava file a valid source file?

It depends on its content, obviously.


When you evaluate a source you should?

Always check another source to make sure what is being presented is accurate and valid.


On the stock market who are the people that can trade stocks?

Any citizen of a country who is above 18 years of age, has a valid source of income and tax payer ID can trade in stocks. People without valid Tax payer ID or a valid source of income will not be allowed to trade in the stock market.


Is filenametxt a valid name for a c source?

Any valid file name is a valid name for a C source file. The extension itself is immaterial; it is part of the file name and only serves as a means of organising files. The extensions .c and .h are merely a convention. You don't have to use them if you don't want to, but it makes sense to stick to the recognised conventions, particularly if you intend to distribute your source.


What is most important for the writer of a research report to determine about a source?

How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.


What is most important about a writer of a research report determine about a source?

How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.


What is most important for a writer of a research report determine about a source?

How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.


What is most important for a writer of a research report to determine about a source?

How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.


Suppose that you are trying to determine whether a secondary source is valid. What information about the source's creator would be most helpful to you?

Answer this question… The author's area of expertise


What would not be considered a primary source for a history term paper on Lincoln's Gettysburg Address?

A contemporary scholar's discussion of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address would not be considered a primary source, but a secondary source. It may still be a valid source of information, however.