no. animal testing is not always accurate because the body structure of an animal is differnet than the body structer of a human being. Hence the results may not be the same.
Not at all. If you are a monkey or a rabbit then yes.
We don't have the same type of tissues and bodily structures, making it ineffective to test products on animals and having the same results on humans.
NO!!!! Animals are so much different than humans, It is hard to tell if something doesn't hurt them, if it could still hurt us. Actually smoking health problems were caused when in the early 1970's beagles were tested on with cigarettes. The beagles didn't exactly develop cancer because, well, they're beagles, so smoking warnings were postponed. Oops. If you wanna learn more about animal testing you can Google SAEN and click on the first link that comes up. STOP ANIMAL TESTING!!!!! =) NO!!!! Animals are so much different than humans, It is hard to tell if something doesn't hurt them, if it could still hurt us. Actually smoking health problems were caused when in the early 1970's beagles were tested on with cigarettes. The beagles didn't exactly develop cancer because, well, they're beagles, so smoking warnings were postponed. Oops. If you wanna learn more about animal testing you can google SAEN and click on the first link that comes up. STOP ANIMAL TESTING!!!!! =)
That would depend on the nature of the test.
If the test is to put down two bowls of food, and see which the animal prefers to eat, then probably not.
If the test is to see how poisonous a new shampoo is by force-feeding it to rabbits until they die, then I guess it is fairly harmful to the rabbits in question.
I don't think that animal testing is beneficial to animals because i think that in most cases it can hurt the animal, get them sick, or even kill them. also animals were not put on this earth to be tested on they are just like us, what if they tested things on you? and don't say that they wouldn't because your not an animal, because that's when pretending comes in. Animals also don't have a say when it comes to animal testing
In most cases animal testing is about 60% affective, consider animals and humans have a lot in common and they have some of the same body mass and functions. However, not all animals are like humans, and in some cases its argued that testing on animals are abusive.
sometimes but mostly it is not necessary and sometimes not necessary at all.
no its not helpful
Every year about 1 billion dollars is spent on animal testing even though there is cheaper and more effective ways. 92% of drugs that pass animal testing fail clinical trials. Animals and humans dont have the same effects.
to help cure diseases like HIV or etc without testing on humans since animals are similar to humans, they will carry an effective result.
no it is not as bad then animal testing
SUPER EXPTREMLY EXPENSIVE animal testing is the cheapest and most efficiant way
Yes, animal testing is around the whole world !
No. There is no legal requirement for animal testing.
well if the testing is from animal haters the animal will die but if they are good it will live......
if you believe in animal testing...you have no morals,,,i no this because i just wrote a 5 page paper on animal testing and its horrid
the cons of animal testing r- costs bunches of $$$
Animal testing sould be illegal because it is harming the animal.
It is a slightly grey area, but generally no.
The current laws regarding animal testing are that the animal testing must be carefully reviewed and overseen. There are several laws regulating the use of animals for testing.