This is one of those deceptively simple situations, in which you think liability would be easy to determine. It's not.
Many insurance carriers automatically assume there will be comparative negligence in a parking lot accident. In your case, you'll want to look at a few things before deciding on negligence:
1. Where did your two cars meet in the aisle? Midway, more towards your side or the other driver's?
2. How are cars positioned in this lot? Straight in, diagonally?
3. What was the point-of-impact between the vehicles? Was it corner to corner, or more bumper corner to center of the other vehicle?
What you're trying to determine is if one vehicle had more control of the parking lot aisle than the other. For instance, if you backed out and the center of your rear bumper hit the passenger door of the other vehicle, we can pretty much assume the other vehicle had control of the aisle.
Also, depending on the liability laws in your state, even if you're both 50% at-fault, you might be able to collect 50% of your damages...or nothing at all. In some states, if you're 51% or more at-fault you can't collect; in other states (very few actually), you can collect for any percentage that the other driver was at-fault. Talk to your claims adjuster and he or she can fill you in on those laws.
Good luck!
If they were to collide their equal but opposite energy would cancel out.
The "C" stands for "Collider" For something to collide there has to be a second something moving in a different direction to collide with. The contents of the two beams moving in opposite directions collide.
It is due to the momentum of the two bodies.
This occurs when plates are pushed in opposite directions along a horizontal plane.
Both the gliders will be travelling at exactly the same speed as the initial velocity but in opposite directions.
If they collide head on, the wreckage will remain at the point of impact (real world considerations aside).
If you are driving the backing car, no matter WHERE the other cas is located, YOU are the one at fault if you collide with it.
Never, since they are travelling in opposite directions.. . . but probably not the one the algebra book's authors intended....If you assume that "opposite directions" means the cars are travelling towards each other, their closing speed (i.e. relative speed) is 105 mph. That means they'll meet in 100/105 hours, or slightly more than 57 minutes.
They have identical momentum before the collision . The total momentum will the the same before and after the collision. When the balls collide they will bounce apart both with same force and so the same momentum as originally - but in opposite directions. This assumes no energy loss in an ideal elastic collision.
Yup. Both of you are at fault, and will most likely have to use your own insurance to repair your cars.
From Newton's third law, when two bodies A and B collide, the force that A exerts on B is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the force that B exerts on A. From Newton's second law, this force produces a rate of change of momentum. Both bodies are experienced to the same magnitude in change of momentum but in opposite directions. Net change in momentum is zero. This implies that momentum is conserved.
Momentum will be conserved (it always is conserved). If the cars also move at the same speed, and the collision is inelastic, they will both stop completely.