It is not it just simply is not
We cannot identify a person specifically with hair alone. Even if their is mtDNA, it isn't good enough-DNA is class evidence anyway.
bats belong to the class mammalia, this is because they are warm blooded, have hair, bear live young and feed their babies milk.
Hair contains DNA. It can be examined in a lab to possibly discover who it belongs to, or at least biological information about them. It can help to quickly narrow down the pool of suspects.
Mammals are the only animals that have true hair. This feature is what sets them apart from other animals.
The crinoid stalks and blastoid heads are the common fossils that best distinguish the classes of birds and reptiles. They classify birds to class aves and reptiles to the class reptilia.
We cannot identify a person specifically with hair alone. Even if their is mtDNA, it isn't good enough-DNA is class evidence anyway.
Hair can be used for a DNA profile.
class 3
Fibers are CLASS evidence. They cannot be individualized to a single person or thing, although there are many types of natural and synthetic fibers.
The only thing taking a gun class is "evidence" of is the fact that (if you passed) that you are now legally assumed to be knowledgeable in the use and handling of firearms.
Class evidence is the category for most evidence. Class evidence is evidence associated with a group and not a single source. Example: general piece of something (like a paint chip) blood (we can only generalize) Individual evidence is evidence that can be virtually, unambiguously traced to a source. Example: finger prints DNA tool marks (under a microscope) anything torn or broken (must be very specific)
Class evidence is evidence that can be linked to a group of people rather than individual evidence which can only be linked to one person. Although class evidence can help solve cases, its not guaranteed to solve it. An example of class evidence is if a shoe print is left behind and the only thing they can make of it is the shoe size or make, that would be a class characteristic since many other people may have that same shoe size and make. The shoe print may also be individual evidence due to the fact that not everyone walks the same. If the shoe has wear on a specific part then we can infer that the suspect walks with more weight on that part of there feet.
-.-
DNA
Root of the hair containing protoplasm
The difference is that I only work on math
There is no evidence of a link.