Want this question answered?
Hate speech and speech likely to incite violence are not protected .
because tyhe don't have freedom of speech
well in America we have this thing called freedom of speech. for real look it up.
If a newspaper knowingly publishes false information about a celebrity's religious beliefs, it could be accused of defamation or libel, which could restrict their freedom of speech. Additionally, if the false information incites hate or discrimination against the celebrity based on their religion, it may be considered hate speech and not protected under freedom of speech laws.
Timothy C. Shiell has written: 'Legal Philosophy' 'Campus hate speech on trial' -- subject(s): Discrimination in higher education, Freedom of speech, Hate speech, Law and legislation
Germans have a right to freedom of speech. Their restrictions on freedom of speech are similar to those in America. One restriction in Germany that is notable is that efforts advocating removal of democracy are not covered as free speech. Another restriction is that Germans are not permitted to deny Nazi atrocities. Hate speech and incitement to riot are banned.
"Freedom of expression" allows you to exercise constitutionally protected FREE SPEECH. It does not allow you to commit a criminal act in pursuit of it.
Islam does not hate freedom.
Hate speech criminalization is a major limitation on speech. Diversity people are granted special protection by big government so as to prevent their hurt feelings and prevent them from reacting with violence toward a hate speaker. If a Diversity person or a hate speaker react with any form of violence, only the hate speaker is necessarily subject to government prosecution for hate speech. The intent of hate speech criminalization is to chill criticism of Diversity people. Another limitation on speech is free speech zones designated by big government. Outside a free speech zone a speaker is subject to arrest and prosecution.
Hate speech criminalization is a major limitation on speech. Diversity people are granted special protection by big government so as to prevent their hurt feelings and prevent them from reacting with violence toward a hate speaker. If a Diversity person or a hate speaker react with any form of violence, only the hate speaker is necessarily subject to government prosecution for hate speech. The intent of hate speech criminalization is to chill criticism of Diversity people. Another limitation on speech is free speech zones designated by big government. Outside a free speech zone a speaker is subject to arrest and prosecution.
A speech, involving hate
No, giving a speech is not considered a criminal act unless the content of the speech incites violence or is a form of hate speech that is prohibited by law. In most cases, a speech is protected by freedom of speech laws.