It does not produce carbon dioxide or other combustion gases, but the long term waste problem is huge and not being tackled.
The problem is that nobody want to deal with it, and they keep throwing up unrealistic roadblocks, based on misunderstand and (sometimes) deliberate misinformation. Yucca Mountain was built to handle high level waste, but is apparently being stalled due to politics. (Similarly, Shoreham, a brand new 851 MWe BWR was finished, licensed, and thrown away, costing $6 billion dollars, all because of politics, in the early 90's.)
I have heard estimates that the high level waste from all 100 some odd US nuclear facilities has a volume of about one football field to a depth of 6 feet per year. That sounds like a lot, but it actually isn't, when you consider that the mountain of ash from one coal plant exceeds that, and is in itself very radioactive. And that is not even considering the environmental consequences of continuing to pour CO2 and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere at the astounding rate we are currently producing.
We need sanity, and we need it now. We are at the point where we need to build new nuclear power plants. There are no realistic alternatives. Not now, and not for the near to mid future. Fusion is not ready. Truely green alternatives are not ready in the large scale. Only fission is ready. We need to put our foot down and let hard science and engineering prevail.
Oh, and by the way, we need electric cars to go with those nuclear power plants. It only makes sense. Fossil fuel usage has to stop.
Nuclear power has no dangers. It is the opposite. Nuclear energy is a clean source for power production. It is even cleaner than solar energy. Power generation from nuclear energy is cheaper than that produced from solar, wind, gas, oil, and wind energy sources. Nuclear radiation from nuclear power plants is 100 times less than nuclear radiation from coal fired power plants. Nuclear weapons are of mass destruction nature due to emitted nuclear radiation, heat, and pressure air waves.
The main advantage of nuclear power is that it does not depend on manufacturing carbon dioxide from carbon fuels, as gas, oil and coal power plants do, so nuclear power plants save millions of tons of CO2 being dumped into the atmosphere.
Yes, it is cheaper and cleaner, except when it explodes due to an unpredictable event.
It's definitely cleaner than fossil fuels. It produces very little pollution, just waste, which can be stored safely. As for whether it's more "efficient", you need to define what you mean. Nuclear power plants use far smaller amounts of fuel than fossil plants.
See www.world-nuclear.org for country by country information:INFORMATION PAPERSNUCLEAR BASICSOutline History of Nuclear Energy The Nuclear Debate GlossaryFACTS AND FIGURESWorld Nuclear Power Reactors 2008-09 and Uranium Requirements Nuclear share figures, 1998-2008 - May 2009 Uranium production figures, 1998-2008 - June 2009COUNTRY AND REGIONAL BRIEFINGSUranium in Africa Nuclear Power in Argentina Nuclear Power in Armenia Australia's Uranium Nuclear Energy Prospects in Australia Nuclear Power in Belgium Nuclear Power in Brazil Nuclear Power in Bulgaria California's Electricity Nuclear Power in Canada Nuclear Power in Canada Appendix 1: Ontario Energy Policy Nuclear Power in Canada Appendix 2: Alberta Tar Sands Uranium in Canada Uranium in Canada Appendix 1: Brief History of Uranium Mining in Canada Uranium in Central Asia Nuclear Power in China Nuclear Power in China Appendix 1: Government Structure and Ownership China's Nuclear Fuel Cycle Nuclear Power in Czech Republic Nuclear Energy in Denmark Nuclear Power in Finland Nuclear Power in France Nuclear Power in Germany Nuclear Power in Hungary Nuclear Power in India Nuclear Energy in Iran Nuclear Power in Italy Nuclear Power in Japan Uranium and Nuclear Power in Kazakhstan Nuclear Power in Korea Nuclear Power in Lithuania Nuclear Power in Mexico Uranium in Namibia Nuclear Energy Prospects in New Zealand Nuclear Power in the Netherlands Uranium in Niger Nuclear Power in Pakistan Nuclear Power in Romania Nuclear Power in Russia Nuclear Power in Slovakia Nuclear Power in Slovenia Nuclear Power in South Africa Nuclear Power in Spain Nuclear Power in Sweden Nuclear Power in Sweden Appendix 1: Barsebäck Closure Nuclear Power in Switzerland Nuclear Power in Taiwan Nuclear Power in the United Kingdom Nuclear Power in Ukraine Nuclear Power in United Arab Emirates Nuclear Power in the USA Nuclear Power in the USA Appendix 1: US Operating Nuclear Reactors Nuclear Power in the USA Appendix 2 Power Plant Purchases: Nuclear Power in the USA Appendix 3: COL Applications US Nuclear Fuel Cycle US Nuclear Fuel Cycle Appendix 1: US Uranium Mining and Exploration US Nuclear Power Policy Emerging Nuclear Energy Countries
nuclear
because it doesn't create pollution and it is greener than coal and nuclear power plants :P
because it doesn't create pollution and it is greener than coal and nuclear power plants :P
because it doesn't create pollution and it is greener than coal and nuclear power plants :P
Yes, it provides cleaner more efficiient energy
meaner, leaner, cleaner, dreamer, greener, steamer, wiener(hotdog)...
Cleaner, gleaner, leaner, meaner, screener. Seen 'er wiener?
Nuclear power has no dangers. It is the opposite. Nuclear energy is a clean source for power production. It is even cleaner than solar energy. Power generation from nuclear energy is cheaper than that produced from solar, wind, gas, oil, and wind energy sources. Nuclear radiation from nuclear power plants is 100 times less than nuclear radiation from coal fired power plants. Nuclear weapons are of mass destruction nature due to emitted nuclear radiation, heat, and pressure air waves.
The main advantage of nuclear power is that it does not depend on manufacturing carbon dioxide from carbon fuels, as gas, oil and coal power plants do, so nuclear power plants save millions of tons of CO2 being dumped into the atmosphere.
it is a cleaner source of energy so it can replace nuclear power and does not melt down like in japan
cleaner delhi, greener delhi,prouder delhi!
nuclear energy