For all the Inner Party is concerned, perpetual war is no different than perpetual peace. War, by being everlasting, is really not making any changes to Oceania's current society. When its existence offers no changes and zero impact, it is as if it doesn't even exist. As Goldstein's book puts it: "by becoming continuous, war has ceased to exist." (Orwell, pg. 207)
In the age of Big Brother, "the war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society intact." (Orwell, pg. 207) When the main goal of the Inner Party is to establish an equilibrium of its hierarchical society, all it's after is consistency. Constant war and constant peace, they are essentially the same thing. Hence, the doublethink phrase: War is Peace.
took more than two years to reach a peace agreement.
I heard in a military academic lecture that peace has existed less than 5% of the time.
This quote is simply saying that peace is better than war. If there "never was a good war" that means that all war is bad; and if "there never was a bad peace" then all peace is good.
centralizing government
When UN Colonel Oliver states, "We are peace-keepers, not peacemakers," he emphasizes the role of peacekeepers in maintaining stability and order rather than actively resolving conflict. Peacekeepers are tasked with enforcing existing peace agreements and protecting civilians, while peacemakers engage in diplomatic efforts to negotiate and create peace. This distinction highlights the limitations of peacekeeping missions, which often focus on preventing violence rather than addressing the underlying causes of conflict.
Neither can exist
Neither can exist
The reason that there are perpetual conflicts in the Middle East is the unwillingness of different people with different ideologies to compromise to create a more harmonious society. People would rather be right (correct) than be at peace.
No. There are minimal gold deposits in the Middle East. The reason that there are perpetual conflicts in the Middle East is the unwillingness of different people with different ideologies to compromise to create a more harmonious society. People would rather be right (correct) than be at peace.
Other than perhaps different molding locations, they should be similar
The government has no role in a traditional economy other than keeping peace to the degree where different individuals can conduct trade in peace.
No. The 1989 Prelude's body style is different, and a little larger, than the 1984 body style.
Not recommended
It is not possible to design an electric motor generator to achieve perpetual motion because it goes against the laws of physics. Perpetual motion would require the motor to continuously generate more energy than it consumes, which is not feasible.
Immanuel Kant does not specifically advocate for a single universe government. However, in his work "Perpetual Peace," he argues that a cosmopolitan (global) federation of states based on principles of equality and international law could help maintain peace. This federation would entail cooperation between sovereign states, rather than a centralized single world government.
Perpetual motion. This answer is more related to the question "What do all machines DO NOT HAVE.
Just set a clock to something other than 3 dude