Want this question answered?
Note: 'Excessive' is not an objective term to use for economics analysis. Monopoly profits usually represent a form of price mark-up, setting MC = MR and then vertically matching the maximum willingness-to-pay for that unit and all units before it on the demand curve. This is socially inefficient but privately optimal.
true
yes it is
Yes
The King Monopoly is gaining all the profits from the laborers' hard work
by eliminating competition to control prices
a cartel is a group that agrees to charge monopoly price and quantity, splitting quantity amongst themselves. so a monopoly is one company and a cartel is a group. Profits are lower for cartel members because they only produce a total quantity that is equal to a monopolists production. novanet-businesses making the same product agree to limit production
A monopoly typically produces in the inelastic part of the demand curve because it has control over the quantity supplied and can set prices higher without losing too many customers. This allows the monopoly to maximize its profits by charging higher prices for its products.
Excess profits piling up from tariffs and business combinations.
Most businesses aim to operate at its profit-maximizing level at all times, but many factors make this nearly impossible. For instance, if they are short on workers they wouldn't be able to maximize profits.
Monopoly and Oligopoly are both the only firms that may make positive profit in the long run. Under LONG-RUN MARKET TENDENCY OF PRICE AND ATC: Monopoly P>ATC and Oligopoly P>ATC both will have postive profits, however it possible to turn to zero profits if there isn't capitalization of the profits or any rent-seeking activities or if the market is contestable. But moreover, the answer you're looking for is the above that bother Monopoly and Oligopoly will have positive profit in the long run.
Shared or Joint monopoly refers to anticompetitive behaviour by firms, normally an oligopoly, in order to secure monopoly profits for the firms as a group. Essentially, shared monopoly requires some form of collusion but stops short of being a formal cartel. It is therefore similar to tacit collusion. In a shared monopoly firms may not compete for the same customers and have instead local monopolies.