Want this question answered?
First, Congress (legislative branch) needs to think of a law relating to gun control. Then, if the president (executive branch) agrees with it, he/she will sign it. Then, it goes to the judicial branch where the court of nine judges decides if it is against the constitution or not. If it is not against it, then it will become a law. So, you basically need all of the branches to make a law.
The laws are proposed by the legislative branch (Senate and House), signed into law by the Executive Branch (President), and either upheld or struck down by the Judicial Branch (Supreme Court). The agency responsible (on the federal side) is the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATFE).
The legislative branch, comprised of the congress and senate, deliberate and create laws. The executive branch enforces the law and has a veto capacity (so the president doesn't create law, but has a no vote that can be outvoted by congress), and the judicial branch interprets questions of law, sometimes invalidating laws which it finds unconstitutional.
I was a proponent of the judicial system until that litigious son of a gun sued me.
Yes.
If you are "pro" in the gun control debate, you are for less gun control. In other words, you are "pro-gun".
There is no "gun control" amendment.
opposing.Versus, contra, counter"I am against gun control" could also be phrased "I'm opposed to gun control", "I'm anti-gun control", "I'm an opponent of gun control", "I disagree with the idea of gun control"
Gun Control
They have gun laws. Whether they actually have the words "gun control" within any of their firearms legislature, I don't know, but they do have gun control.
Yes, Ross Perot is for gun control. He was not a typical Conservative and was pro gun control and pro choice.
It is extremely anti-gun control.