answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Actually it isn't. Or at least, not everybody is convinced. It has several large loopholes; for example:* The cosmological argument assumes that everything must have a cause; therefore, it says, the Universe must have a cause. But if you assume that there is a God who created the Universe, this God (applying the same argument) must itself have a cause.

* Even if we assume that something created the Universe, the cosmological argument doesn't allow you to make any conclusions about the identity of the creator... or creators. There might be a single God, many gods, or we might (for example) be part of a computer simulation on a "higher level"; and the "cause" might not even be an intelligent being, but random chance.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How is the cosmological argument convincing?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

When was The Kalām Cosmological Argument created?

The Kalām Cosmological Argument was created in 1979.


How many pages does The Kalām Cosmological Argument have?

The Kalām Cosmological Argument has 216 pages.


Is the big bang theory a strong challenge to the cosmological argument?

As far as I understand, the Big Bang theory is not a challenge to the cosmological argument at all. The cosmological argument states that there must have been a beginning to the universe, which is confirmed by modern science. The cosmological argument further is often held to indicate that that beginning must have been an intelligent agent, which is neither confirmed nor denied by cosmology.


Is the design argument a convincing argument?

The design argument, which posits that the complexity and order in the universe suggest a designer, is convincing to some people because it provides a logical explanation for the existence of complex systems. However, others find it unconvincing due to alternative explanations, like natural selection, and the lack of direct evidence for a designer. Ultimately, the persuasiveness of the design argument can vary depending on an individual's perspective and beliefs.


Is the kalam cosmological argument sound or valid?

The kalam cosmological argument is considered by many philosophers and theologians to be both valid and sound. The argument uses logic to try to demonstrate that the universe had a cause and that this cause must be a transcendent, uncaused, and timeless being, which many identify as God. However, there is ongoing debate and criticism within the philosophical community about its premises and implications.


Did Jefferson's list of grievances made his argument more or less convincing?

Does this list make his argument more or less convincing? Why?


Does Charles beard make a convincing argument?

No.


You use logic to construct a convincing argument in order to persuade someone this is referred to as?

An argument.


Who was one of the main proponents of the cosmological argument?

Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas. For additional supporters of this argument, check the corresponding Wikipedia article.


What is Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 are they convincing?

Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 that were really convincing was his argument in favour of parliamentary reform. Thank you very much, but what exactly is his argument. I'm reading over the Bill and just cannot understand what his argument actually is.


What does the cosmological argument teach us about God?

It teaches that God has no beginning because he as always been there


Why is the politician's argument not very convincing?

It confuses correlation with causation