Well, that government would not be able to modernize with the rest of the world. Amendments allow a Constitution to be changed so without them it would become outdated. For the US, the Constitution would still be how it was when it was drafted, and it would basically be the supreme law of the land in the 21st century, but still in a 1700's time period, if that makes sense.
very bad,there would be little to no laws and violence wil be worst then today
The Constitution would remain unchanged in its first designed form.
Then the amendment does not become part of the constitution.
There would be no laws.
By letting them choice their life or religion.
What amendments to the Bill of Rights have had the most impact on business? What would business life be like without them?
Amendments were added to the constitution to change African Americans life. Such as no more slavery in any part of the US. The amendments were 15 though like 18.
It would be bad. Soldiers could violate the right of the people and even use guns to bully them.
Most likely we would be a monarchy of some sort.
The Bill of Rights of the United States is part of the Constitution. The Constitution is the supreme law. The Bill of Rights is a set of amendments that limit the authority of the federal government and guarantee rights of the people.
people would live alot diffrent lives and we would have diffrrent cities and communites. we would eat differently and live our lives without alot of things. there you have your answer fo "how would life be different without the construction fo the us?"
The Constitution including its Amendments is the only thing that protects us from a government taking away all our rights. The Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments to the Constitution) and a few other amendments (especially the 14th) are crucial to protecting our individual liberties. There is no other guarantee that we would have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of association, all of which are essential to protecting the rights of the individual against the government, except for what is stated in the Bill of Rights. There would be no equal protection under law, no protection against the government tapping your phone or reading your mail, no right to trial by jury and the ability to confront the witnesses against you, without the amendments to the Constitution. Without the right of freedom of speech, we would not have the right to criticize the government. Without freedom of the press, access to information about the government would be far more limited. Without freedom of association, we would not have the right to create organizations and even political parties to suggest and promote passage of certain laws. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that we will not "be deprived of life, liberty of property without due process of law." Without the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Amendments, a police officer or national security agent could enter our homes at any time without a warrant, take us to jail, refuse to let us talk to a lawyer, bring the case before a judge (we would have no right to a jury) in a trial closed to the press and the public, refuse to let us know what we are accused of, have no right to face the witnesses against us and compel witnesses to testify. We could be found guilty and condemned without ever having a chance to defend ourselves. We might not even be able to tell anyone else is happening, including our spouses.
The Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments to the Constitution) and a few other amendments (especially the 14th) are crucial to protecting our individual liberties. There is no other guarantee that we would have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of association, all of which are essential to protecting the rights of the individual against the government, except for what is stated in the Bill of Rights. There would be no equal protection under law, no protection against the government tapping your phone or reading your mail, no right to trial by jury and the ability to confront the witnesses against you, without the amendments to the Constitution. Without the right of freedom of speech, we would not have the right to criticize the government. Without freedom of the press, access to information about the government would be far more limited. Without freedom of association, we would not have the right to create organizations and even political parties to suggest and promote passage of certain laws. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that we will not "be deprived of life, liberty of property without due process of law." Without the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Amendments, a police officer or national security agent could enter our homes at any time without a warrant, take us to jail, refuse to let us talk to a lawyer, bring the case before a judge (we would have no right to a jury) in a trial closed to the press and the public, refuse to let us know what we are accused of, have no right to face the witnesses against us and compel witnesses to testify. We could be found guilty and condemned without ever having a chance to defend ourselves. We might not even be able to tell anyone else is happening, including our spouses. The Constitution including its Amendments is the only thing that protects us from a government taking away all our rights.
We have amended our ways by adding laws, and making specific changes to our way of life, including several amendments to our Constitution.
While the term "Habeas Corpus" appears in the body of the Constitution (Article I, Section 9 ... "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."), it does not appear in either the Fifth or the Fourteenth Amendments, although the broad concept is echoed in them: The term Habeas Corpus does not appear in the US Constitution. The concept upon which it is based is found in both of the amendments: V. No person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; and XIV. No State shall . . . nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
life without ukulele would be dissapointing