Want this question answered?
If you counted 1 number per second, it would take 4000 trillion months (320 trillion years) to count all 10 billion trillion stars (100 billion per galaxy) in a fictitious version of our universe.
If you counted at the rate of one number per second, it would take 320 trillion years to count to 10 billion trillion. It makes no difference WHAT you're counting.
That would be a sign that the Universe is contracting, instead of expanding as it currently is.That would be a sign that the Universe is contracting, instead of expanding as it currently is.That would be a sign that the Universe is contracting, instead of expanding as it currently is.That would be a sign that the Universe is contracting, instead of expanding as it currently is.
My guess is fewer than 100.
No, because then all the mass of the Universe would have a starting point from which it came from. Contrary to popular representations of the early cosmos, that is NOT what happened. The BB was NOT an explosion of mass into empty space, it was an expansion of all space, at every point in our Universe away from every point in our Universe. If the BB were an explosion, the cosmic microwave background radiation would have a preferred direction it was coming from -- and it doesn't. Your idea is interesting, but it simply doesn't fit the observed facts of our Universe.
Jewish tradition states that God is constantly maintaining the existence of the universe. Were God to withdraw his will that the universe exist, it would vanish. See also:Can you show that God exists
If you counted 1 dwarf galaxy per second, it would take 222,000 years to count all 7 trillion dwarf galaxies in the universe.
Answer:The biggest thing known to man is the Universe (Not observable universe) But if Omniverse exist, that would be the biggest thing known to Man.
If you counted 1 intelligent alien civilization per second, it would take 400 million years to count all 12,600 trillion intelligent alien civilizations in the universe.
Every five enslaved persons would count as three free persons. This is known as the Three-Fifths Compromise
It would take about a googolplex - it doesn't make much difference, in this case, whether you are talking about googolplex of nanoseconds, seconds, or millennia. Nor does it make much difference whether you count a million numbers every second, or take a year for each number. In any case, it would be much, much more than the current age of the Universe.
Alot of things are considered satellites. If we count objects in orbit around our planet, we would have to count every bit of anything, from a lost bolt to a cluster of frozen gas and dust. But if your question is: How many satellites have we launched into space? The answer is currently somewhere around 35,000.
That would be the distance from one edge of the Known Universe to the other. As the Known Universe is believed to be approximately 15 billion years old, that would be 30 billion light years in diameter.
Then you would need lots of digits to write down some numbers, like the diameter of the known Universe in meters, the mass of the Sun in kilometers, the mass of an electron in kilograms, Avogadro's number, etc. This would be very confusing - it is much easier to have the number of digits shown in scientific notation, than having to count them every time.
you would have to count 5.78703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703... numbers every second
That question cannot be answered. We would have to know the magnitude of every star in the universe. The universe is infinite (and expanding). It's impossible to answer your question.
The three fifths compromise was the plan that proposed that every five enslaved persons would count as three free persons.