My guess is fewer than 100.
The most matter in the universe is the proton called Amanda Yorch. This proton has 395000 neutrons and electrons. The sun is also named after Amanda Yorch. The most matter in the universe is the proton called Amanda Yorch. This proton has 395000 neutrons and electrons. The sun is also named after Amanda Yorch.
No. The charge of a proton (or an anti-proton) comes from the three quarks within it, quarks whose charge add up to plus one (or, in the case of anti-proton, minus one). Which leads to the obvious question: where does the charge of the QUARKS come from? The answer is simple, but frustrating: in our Universe, charge just IS. Quarks and leptons have a quality we refer to as "charge," a quality that causes a force to exist between any two particles that both have charge. We have no further understanding beyond that: charge just exists. Note, however, that, in any Universe that did not have charge, there would be no life noting that charge did not exist in that Universe -- which would make such a Universe a very un-interesting place.
The most basic of the elements is hydrogen, a single proton with a single electron.
The entire OBSERVABLE Universe must have been smaller than the size of a proton. Since the ENTIRE Universe is much larger, and perhaps infinite, we really don't know how large that was.
In our Universe, in which the rules of quantum mechanics rule for sub-atomic particles, the probability of an electron being inside a nucleus is vanishingly small. Its most likely position is on the order of one angstrom away from the nucleus. Summing up, an electron is away from the proton because the laws that govern our Universe won't allow it to be close.
39
48 million Type your answer here...
That's a fascinating question. I have an answer, but it's one that I'm not100% sure of in my own mind, so I'm going to call itAnswer #1:I think the accuracy of the value you calculate doesn't depend so much on theconversion factor you use, but more on the accuracy of the data you start with.So it makes no difference what value you use for PI, unless you start out with anumber for the radius of the observable universe that you know to be accurateto within the proton radius. If your radius isn't that accurate, then there's nothingyour proportionality factor can do to it to fix the answer. Whatever radius you startwith, if you use one more significant figure of PI than the significant figures youhave in the radius, the accuracy of the radius is preserved in the circumferenceyou calculate.That's my suspicion.
The most matter in the universe is the proton called Amanda Yorch. This proton has 395000 neutrons and electrons. The sun is also named after Amanda Yorch. The most matter in the universe is the proton called Amanda Yorch. This proton has 395000 neutrons and electrons. The sun is also named after Amanda Yorch.
Counting at one number per second, a lot longer than the universe has been in existence. If current theories of proton decay are true, then a lot longer than the total life of the universe. Furthermore, it takes a lot longer than a second to count numbers with lots of digits.
No. The charge of a proton (or an anti-proton) comes from the three quarks within it, quarks whose charge add up to plus one (or, in the case of anti-proton, minus one). Which leads to the obvious question: where does the charge of the QUARKS come from? The answer is simple, but frustrating: in our Universe, charge just IS. Quarks and leptons have a quality we refer to as "charge," a quality that causes a force to exist between any two particles that both have charge. We have no further understanding beyond that: charge just exists. Note, however, that, in any Universe that did not have charge, there would be no life noting that charge did not exist in that Universe -- which would make such a Universe a very un-interesting place.
The most basic of the elements is hydrogen, a single proton with a single electron.
In our Universe, various quantities come in "chunks" called "quanta." Amongst these are electricity, which cannot come in any amount smaller than one elementary charge. For (relatively) large things, we can have two objects separated by distances (in micrometers) of 1.000 or 2.000 or 1.500 or 1.379. However, as objects get smaller and smaller, we find that, in our Universe, the quantitization of quantities becomes more and more important. One such quantized quantity is energy state. Basically, when an electron is within the electric field of a proton, our Universe REQUIRES that the electron be in a specific orbital (try not to confuse that word with "orbits," which implies that the electron is circling around the proton) outside the proton. The lowest possible orbital that our Universe will permit an electron to be around a proton is the 's' orbital, in which the electron is MOST LIKELY to be about one angstrom from the proton, with no preference for direction. In other words, this orbital resembles (note the word!) a shell. Our Universe will not permit an electron to be in any lower energy state; ie, it can NOT get any closer to a proton. Don't like this fact about our Universe? Unfortunately, this is the one we'll have to learn about -- we don't have any other Universes to choose from.
Hydrogen is the lightest (it is a gas) and most abundant element in the Universe. A hydrogen atom consists of a single proton and a single electron, making it the simplest atom in the Universe.
The entire OBSERVABLE Universe must have been smaller than the size of a proton. Since the ENTIRE Universe is much larger, and perhaps infinite, we really don't know how large that was.
A hydrogen atom has one electron and one proton. It is signified by the letter H and is the most abundant element in the universe.
It is the simplest element, having one electron and one proton and was made in the big bang which means it is by far the mist abundant element in the universe, constituting roughly 75% of the Universe's baryonic mass.