I have no clue.
In Washington state from 2007 to 2008, roughly 1850 animals died due to animal testing :(
Each year there is an estimate of 100 million animals so times that by 10 and you've got 1000 million animals dieing from animal testing! That alot of animals :/
13, 000 animals died due to animal testing in 2009. A majority of these deaths were due to cross breeding, as scientists try to create more animal species.(cross breeding is when scientists combine two genes from two different animals.)
In a 12 year span, as much as 100 million animals died from testing. Equally chilling is the treatment of exotic animals for their fur and meat. an example: Huntingdon played a big role in the testing that took place to bring Splenda to the market. An estimated 12,800 animals died in the process according to a published report in a recent scientific journal. The time span for this was only about 1-2 years
About 22 animals die every second in testing labs around the world each second. So 22 x 32,536,000(seconds in a calendar year) = 693,792,000 animals die every year.
erm.... well, WAY WAY WAY WAY WAY over 20 million animals were tested on in 2007, and almost every animal tested on dies. Lets say around... 70 million animals? At least that. I've also read 114 million =( ************************************************************************ I read that over 115 million animals die due to animal testing yearly in the US. so if you wanted the amount for the whole world it would be a lot more. So the answer given above cannot be accurate. Check: http://www.stopanimaltests.com/animalTesting101.asp. This is where I found this information. Also, you can read more about animal testing here.
because animals have rights and some died from the products
Animal testing is used to help find cures and treatments for common human ailments and diseases. So the banning of animal testing should increase human suffering. This is a "pro" if you believe human suffering is a good thing. Doctors practice medical procedures on animals before the practice on people. New techniques are often first performed on a handful of animals. Without animal testing, doctors would be forced to practice on people. We could probably find some poor people willing to be tested. This would help reduce poverty, either if they died or were handsomely paid for their participation. Another "pro."
The duration and nature of suffering experienced by animals after testing can vary significantly based on factors such as the type of tests performed, the species involved, and the specific circumstances of the experimentation. In many cases, animals may experience pain or distress during the testing process, and ethical guidelines aim to minimize this suffering. Once an animal has died, they do not experience suffering; however, the impact of their suffering can be felt by those who advocate for animal welfare. Efforts to reduce or eliminate animal testing continue to evolve, seeking alternatives that prevent suffering altogether.
People feel a compassion for animals. They are worried that the animals are getting hurt or they are not being treated humanely. They care about the animals' welfare. They feel that animals should not be made sick or hurt or killed for medical research that benefits people.
Oh come ON that is impossible to get any kind of an accurate count; do you really think the testers would report all if any cases of death?
Not enough of them