Want this question answered?
21
Bicameral
There is absolutely no issue with having a unicameral legislature. Many countries do just fine with a unicameral legislature (Sweden, South Korea, Portugal) or have a bicameral legislature where the upper chamber does practically nothing making a de facto unicameral legislature (Spain and United Kingdom).The argument for having a bicameral legislature in a place like the United States is to balance state and national interests, by giving states equal representation in one body and nationally-allocated representation based on population in other body. It also provides for the legislature to self-check. In many countries, the executive is more powerful, serving the purpose of the self-check, or there are no internal divisions that have unique legislative rights, so balancing national and state divisions is unimportant.
too many
Two. Senate and House of Representatives.
A bicameral legislature has two separate chambers, typically a lower house and an upper house, while a unicameral legislature has only one chamber. Bicameral systems are often seen in federal or larger countries to represent different interests or regions, while unicameral systems are more common in smaller countries or unitary states.
Unicameral is one house deciding its bills Nebraska state government is an example of an unicameral. Bills get through faster as no endless debate but fillibusters are common. Bills can be passed with simple majority yet one sided issues can be darlings and passed without discussion or recomendation of one house or another
The Articles of Confederation did not create a legislative branch with multiple houses. Instead, it established a unicameral legislature where each state had an equal vote, regardless of size or population.
seven
1, Nebraska
5 chambers
It depends on the specific state's constitution. Many states have two houses in the legislature as in the US Congress (a state senate and a state house of representatives).